Small‐seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime

1 The trade‐off between seed mass and the number of seeds a plant can make for a given amount of energy underpins our understanding of seed ecology. However, there is little information on the magnitude of the fecundity advantage of small‐seeded species over an entire plant lifetime. 2 We compiled data from the literature to quantify the relationships between: (i) seed mass and plant size (because the photosynthetic area of a plant determines how much energy is available for allocation to seed production); (ii) seed mass and plant reproductive lifetime (the number of years a plant has to produce seeds); and (iii) seed mass and the number of seeds produced per individual per year, and per lifetime. 3 Seed mass was positively related to all measures of plant size (canopy area, plant height, stem diameter, plant mass and canopy volume). There were also positive correlations between seed mass and time to first reproduction, plant life span, and reproductive life span. Thus, although small‐seeded species produce more seeds per unit canopy area per year than large‐seeded species, large‐seeded species tend to have larger canopies and more reproductive years. 4 These patterns accord well with independently gathered data on annual and lifetime seed production. The negative relationship between seed mass and the number of seeds produced per year was much shallower on a per individual basis than on a per unit canopy basis. Seed mass was not significantly related to the total number of seeds produced by an individual plant throughout its lifetime. 5 Our previous understanding of seed mass as a spectrum from production of many small seeds, each with low establishment probability, to a few large seeds each with higher establishment probability, was missing some important elements. To understand the forces shaping the evolution of seed mass, we will need to consider plant size and longevity, as well as seedling survival rates and the number of seeds that can be produced for a given amount of energy.

[1]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature , 2004 .

[2]  P. Hulme,et al.  Variability in post-dispersal seed predation in deciduous woodland: relative importance of location, seed species, burial and density , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[3]  Asymmetric competition and the evolution of propagule size , 2003 .

[4]  M. Westoby,et al.  Plant height and evolutionary games , 2003 .

[5]  D. Coomes,et al.  Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups , 2003 .

[6]  M. Westoby,et al.  Latitude, seed predation and seed mass , 2003 .

[7]  Ds Falster.  (S)MATR : standardised major axis tests and routines. Version 1.0 , 2003 .

[8]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  An allometric model for seed plant reproduction , 2003 .

[9]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[10]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species , 2002 .

[11]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  On the Vegetative Biomass Partitioning of Seed Plant Leaves, Stems, and Roots , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[12]  N. Weber,et al.  Common Slope Tests for Bivariate Errors‐in‐Variables Models , 2002 .

[13]  M. Leishman.  Does the seed size/number trade‐off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality , 2001 .

[14]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species , 2001 .

[15]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Between-species patterns of covariation in plant size, seed size and fecundity in monocarpic herbs , 2001 .

[16]  O. Eriksson,et al.  A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants , 2000 .

[17]  M. Westoby,et al.  The Evolutionary ecology of seed size , 2000 .

[18]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: a sowing experiment , 1999 .

[19]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  SEEDLING DENSITY DEPENDENCE PROMOTES COEXISTENCE OF BORNEAN RAIN FOREST TREES , 1999 .

[20]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  K. Thompson,et al.  Seed mass, habitat and life history: a re-analysis of Salisbury (1942, 1974) , 1998 .

[22]  H. Kroon,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants , 1997 .

[23]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  Game-Theoretical Evolution of Seed Mass in Multi-Species Ecological Models , 1997 .

[25]  M. Rees.  Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size , 1996 .

[26]  S. Geritz.  Evolutionarily Stable Seed Polymorphism and Small-Scale Spatial Variation in Seedling Density , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[27]  M. Westoby,et al.  Correlates of seed size variation: A comparison among five temperate floras , 1995 .

[28]  M. Westoby,et al.  Hypotheses on Seed Size: Tests Using the Semiarid Flora of Western New South Wales, Australia , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[29]  D. Greene,et al.  Estimating the Mean Annual Seed Production of Trees , 1994 .

[30]  Karl J. Niklas.  THE ALLOMETRY OF PLANT REPRODUCTIVE BIOMASS AND STEM DIAMETER , 1993 .

[31]  Eric L. Charnov,et al.  Life History Invariants: Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Ecology , 1993 .

[32]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Experimental Studies of Seedling Recruitment from Contrasting Seed Distributions , 1992 .

[33]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Size-Number Trade-Offs and the Variation of Seed Size with Plant Resource Status , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  M. Fenner.  Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[35]  B. Shipley,et al.  The Allometry of Seed Production in Herbaceous Angiosperms , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[36]  M. Westoby,et al.  Diaspore weight, dispersal, growth form and perenniality of central australian plants , 1991 .

[37]  D. A. King.  The Adaptive Significance of Tree Height , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[38]  S. Collins.  Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting. On the Ecological Significance of Grazing and Cutting Regimes Applied to Restore Former Species-Rich Grassland Communities in the Netherlands. Jan Pouwel Bakker , 1990 .

[39]  K. Thompson,et al.  Do Big Plants Have Big Seeds? , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[40]  B. McArdle.  The structural relationship: regression in biology , 1988 .

[41]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Selective Interactions of Dispersal, Dormancy, and Seed Size as Adaptations for Reducing Risk in Variable Environments , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Tree height and crown shape, as results of competitive games , 1985 .

[43]  K. Thompson.  Why Biennials are Not as Few as They Ought to Be , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Height in Forest Herbs , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[45]  J. Silvertown.  Seed Size, Life Span, and Germination Date as Coadapted Features of Plant Life History , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[46]  James White,et al.  The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule , 1981 .

[47]  E. Salisbury.  Seed size and mass in relation to environment , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[48]  D. Levin.  The Oil Content of Seeds: An Ecological Perspective , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[49]  H. G. Baker.  Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[50]  John L. Harper,et al.  The Shapes and Sizes of Seeds , 1970 .

[51]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[52]  E. Corner.  The Durian Theory or the Origin of the Modern Tree , 1949 .

[53]  E. Pitman.  A NOTE ON NORMAL CORRELATION , 1939 .