A systematic method for analyzing magnitude estimation data

Abstract Magnitude estimation is frequently used for measuring the strength of subjective sensation in ergonomics studies. Although the data obtained by magnitude estimation are easy to interpret, caution must be taken in both planning/conducting an experiment and analyzing the results. This study presents a systematic and generalized method for analyzing the magnitude estimation data. Critical considerations and recommendations are suggested in each stage of planning, conducting, and analyzing an experiment. An interactive software program (named MEDAS: Magnitude Estimation Data Analysis System) was developed which implemented the rules and procedures for analyzing the magnitude estimation data. Relevance to industry This study presents the rules and procedures for planning, conducting, and analyzing an ergonomics experiment using magnitude estimation. The results of this study can aid ergonomists in designing and evaluating product alternatives based on subjective data obtained by magnitude estimation.

[1]  S. S. Stevens.  The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  Ciriello Vm,et al.  The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces , 1990 .

[3]  A. Logue,et al.  Individual differences in magnitude estimation of loudness , 1976 .

[4]  L E Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A. Mital.  The Psychophysical Approach in Manual Lifting---A Verification Study , 1983, Human factors.

[6]  Mooyoung Jung,et al.  A psychophysical evaluation of interior design alternatives for a high speed train , 1994 .

[7]  R. Gorsuch,et al.  Psychology of Religion , 1988 .

[8]  T. Kuennapas,et al.  Measurement of Occupational Preferences: A Comparison of Scaling Methods , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  S. S. Stevens.  Issues in psychophysical measurement. , 1971 .

[11]  E. Poulton.  The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. , 1968 .

[12]  D. Krantz.  A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching☆ , 1972 .

[13]  Magnitude estimation of the utility of public goods. , 1991 .

[14]  David H. Warren,et al.  Response factors in intermodality localization under conflict conditions , 1980 .

[15]  J. Zwislocki.  Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  R. Verrillo.  Stability of line-length estimates using the method of absolute magnitude estimation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  E. Corlett,et al.  Cross-modality matching as a subjective assessment technique. , 1983, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Milton Lodge,et al.  Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions , 1981 .

[19]  Marvin E. Wolfgang,et al.  The measurement of delinquency , 1965 .

[20]  G. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysical measurement of the judged seriousness of crimes and severity of punishments , 1982 .

[21]  R. Hellman,et al.  Stability of individual loudness functions obtained by magnitude estimation and production , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Fereydoun Aghazadeh,et al.  Psychophysical determination and modeling of load carrying capacity , 1994 .

[24]  S. S. Stevens.  Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.