D-optimal design applied to binding saturation curves of an enkephalin analog in rat brain.

The D-optimal design, a minimal sample design that minimizes the volume of the joint confidence region for the parameters, was used to evaluate binding parameters in a saturation curve with a view to reducing the number of experimental points without loosing accuracy in binding parameter estimates. Binding saturation experiments were performed in rat brain crude membrane preparations with the opioid mu-selective ligand [3H]-[D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAGO), using a sequential procedure. The first experiment consisted of a wide-range saturation curve, which confirmed that [3H]-DAGO binds only one class of specific sites and non-specific sites, and gave information on the experimental range and a first estimate of binding affinity (Ka), capacity (Bmax) and non-specific constant (k). On this basis the D-optimal design was computed and sequential experiments were performed each covering a wide-range traditional saturation curve, the D-optimal design and a splitting of the D-optimal design with the addition of 2 points (+/- 15% of the central point). No appreciable differences were obtained with these designs in parameter estimates and their accuracy. Thus sequential experiments based on D-optimal design seem a valid method for accurate determination of binding parameters, using far fewer points with no loss in parameter estimation accuracy.

[1]  W. G. Hunter,et al.  The use of prior distributions in the design of experiments for parameter estimation in non-linear situations. , 1967, Biometrika.

[2]  P. Munson,et al.  Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors , 1980, Cancer.

[3]  G. N. Wilkinson Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. , 1961, The Biochemical journal.

[4]  W. J. Studden,et al.  Theory Of Optimal Experiments , 1972 .

[5]  W. G. Hunter,et al.  Experimental Design: Review and Comment , 1984 .

[6]  L. Endrenyi,et al.  Optimal design of experiments for the estimation of precise hyperbolic kinetic and binding parameters. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  M Recchia,et al.  MODDIS: a microcomputer program for model discrimination. , 1986, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[8]  R. D. Cook,et al.  A Comparison of Algorithms for Constructing Exact D-Optimal Designs , 1980 .

[9]  D. Verotta,et al.  Differential postnatal development of -, d- and ?-opioid binding sites in rat brain , 1987 .

[10]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[11]  R. Duggleby,et al.  Experimental designs for estimating the kinetic parameters for enzyme-catalysed reactions. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[13]  R. C. St. John,et al.  D-Optimality for Regression Designs: A Review , 1975 .

[14]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  The Design of Experiments for Parameter Estimation , 1968 .

[15]  D Rodbard,et al.  Statistical characterization of the random errors in the radioimmunoassay dose--response variable. , 1976, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  H. Kosterlitz,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF THE k‐SUBTYPE OF THE OPIATE RECEPTOR IN THE GUINEA‐PIG BRAIN , 1981 .

[17]  B. Morgan,et al.  Analogues of β-LPH61–64 posessing selective agonist activity at μ-opiate receptors , 1981 .

[18]  A. Tavani,et al.  Differential postnatal development of -, d- and ?-opioid binding sites in mouse brain , 1985 .