'Natively unfolded' nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) acts as a selective gate that mediates the bidirectional transport of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleus of eukaryotic cells. 'Natively unfolded' nucleoporins (Nups) with domains rich in phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats form the selective permeability barrier and provide binding sites for mobile transport receptors in the NPC. Understanding the structure and function of the FG-Nups barrier under real-time trafficking conditions is still a formidable challenge due to the dynamic nature of a channeled membranous environment. Recently, we have shown that three-dimensional (3D) density maps of transient interactions between the FG-Nups barrier and a cargo-free or a cargo-bound transport receptor in native NPCs can be obtained by an advanced single-molecule fluorescence microscopy approach. Moreover, we found that these interaction sites are spatially clustered into distinct groups in the periphery around a central axial channel with a diameter of approximately 10-20 nm in the NPC. The 3D distribution of interaction sites may indicate some native properties of the FG-Nups barrier. Here we speculate that the selective permeability barrier in the NPC could be formed by clustered FG-Nups.

[1]  J. Gelles,et al.  Imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  K. Schulten,et al.  Association of nuclear pore FG-repeat domains to NTF2 import and export complexes. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Karsten Weis,et al.  Regulating Access to the Genome Nucleocytoplasmic Transport throughout the Cell Cycle , 2003, Cell.

[4]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Specific Binding of the Karyopherin Kap121p to a Subunit of the Nuclear Pore Complex Containing Nup53p, Nup59p, and Nup170p , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  U. Kubitscheck,et al.  Autonomy and robustness of translocation through the nuclear pore complex: a single-molecule study , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  M. Rexach,et al.  A Gradient of Affinity for the Karyopherin Kap95p along the Yeast Nuclear Pore Complex* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  G. Blobel,et al.  A Distinct Nuclear Import Pathway Used by Ribosomal Proteins , 1997, Cell.

[8]  A. Burlingame,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Nucleoporin Interacting Proteins* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  V. Brumfeld,et al.  Passive and Facilitated Transport in Nuclear Pore Complexes Is Largely Uncoupled* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  T. Kues,et al.  Nuclear transport of single molecules , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  S. Wente,et al.  The GLFG Regions of Nup116p and Nup100p Serve as Binding Sites for Both Kap95p and Mex67p at the Nuclear Pore Complex* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  U. Aebi,et al.  Nanomechanical Basis of Selective Gating by the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Science.

[13]  B. Chait,et al.  The Yeast Nuclear Pore Complex: Composition, Architecture, and Transport Mechanism , 2000 .

[14]  M. Rout,et al.  The Nuclear Pore Complex as a Transport Machine* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  G. Blobel,et al.  Kap104p: A Karyopherin Involved in the Nuclear Transport of Messenger RNA Binding Proteins , 1996, Science.

[16]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  K. Schulten,et al.  Cse1p-binding dynamics reveal a binding pattern for FG-repeat nucleoporins on transport receptors. , 2007, Structure.

[18]  D. Görlich,et al.  A Saturated FG-Repeat Hydrogel Can Reproduce the Permeability Properties of Nuclear Pore Complexes , 2007, Cell.

[19]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Visualizing single molecules interacting with nuclear pore complexes by narrow-field epifluorescence microscopy. , 2006, Methods.

[20]  M. Rout,et al.  Pores for thought: nuclear pore complex proteins. , 1994, Trends in cell biology.

[21]  U. Kutay,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[22]  P. Silver,et al.  Mapping interactions between nuclear transport factors in living cells reveals pathways through the nuclear pore complex. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[23]  S. R. Wente,et al.  Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[24]  B. Chait,et al.  The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2007, Nature.

[25]  D. Goldfarb,et al.  Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  B. Chait,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  B. Pontius Close encounters: why unstructured, polymeric domains can increase rates of specific macromolecular association. , 1993, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[28]  B. Quimby,et al.  Functional Analysis of the Hydrophobic Patch on Nuclear Transport Factor 2 Involved in Interactions with the Nuclear Porein Vivo * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  F. Bischoff,et al.  Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[30]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Moore,et al.  Selective Disruption of Nuclear Import by a Functional Mutant Nuclear Transport Carrier , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  E. Hurt,et al.  Complex Formation between Tap and p15 Affects Binding to FG-repeat Nucleoporins and Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[34]  K. Schulten,et al.  Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-beta. , 2005, Structure.

[35]  U. Kutay,et al.  Modulation of nuclear pore topology by transport modifiers. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Joshua L. Phillips,et al.  A Bimodal Distribution of Two Distinct Categories of Intrinsically Disordered Structures with Separate Functions in FG Nucleoporins* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  G. Lipowsky,et al.  NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[38]  K Ribbeck,et al.  Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[39]  S. Otsuka,et al.  Individual binding pockets of importin-β for FG-nucleoporins have different binding properties and different sensitivities to RanGTP , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin β concentration , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  G. Blobel,et al.  Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins , 1995, Cell.

[43]  M. Rexach,et al.  Natively Unfolded Nucleoporins Gate Protein Diffusion across the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Cell.

[44]  F. Förster,et al.  Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Dynamics Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2004, Science.

[45]  R. Peters Translocation Through the Nuclear Pore Complex: Selectivity and Speed by Reduction‐of‐Dimensionality , 2005, Traffic.

[46]  B. Chait,et al.  Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies , 2007, Nature.

[47]  L. J. Terry,et al.  Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  Ed Hurt,et al.  Binding of the Mex67p/Mtr2p Heterodimer to Fxfg, Glfg, and Fg Repeat Nucleoporins Is Essential for Nuclear mRNA Export , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  M. Rout,et al.  Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  D. Platel,et al.  The Mtr2-Mex67 NTF2-like Domain Complex , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  R. Peters,et al.  Permeability of single nuclear pores. , 1999, Biophysical journal.