Discrete-element method simulation of agricultural particles' motion in variable-amplitude screen box

We devise a variable-amplitude screen based on suspender-type reciprocating screen.We obtain the 11 marker-point trajectories on the screen under various conditions.Variable-amplitude screens make agricultural particles at the screen front active.Variable-amplitude screens also make these agricultural particles move back quickly.This method provides reference to solve retention problem of agricultural materials. Cleaning and screening of agricultural materials is an important process in agricultural production. Many researchers have carried out important works in this area based on mechanism, parameter optimization, and particles' motion. In this paper, both advantages and disadvantages of the traditional reciprocating screen widely used in combine harvester were analyzed. Furthermore, a variable-amplitude screening mechanism developed from classical swing bar type reciprocating screens in Adams software was studied, and the trajectories of 11 marker points on the screen under different conditions were obtained. After transforming the motion of a variable-amplitude screen to 3 DOF (degree-of-freedom) motions (two translations and one rotation, 2T-1R), DEM (discrete-element method) simulations of agricultural particles (grain and stalk) in a variable-amplitude screen box were performed based on the Hertz-Mindlin contact model in an EDEM software environment. The results show that the variable-amplitude screen could make the agricultural particles at the front of the screen be quickly thrown up and moved back but could not favor their segregation and separation at the screen front. This variable-amplitude screening method can provide reference for solving the retention problem of agricultural materials at the screen front.

[1]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Identification of the cleaning process on combine harvesters. Part I: A fuzzy model for prediction of the material other than grain (MOG) content in the grain bin , 2008 .

[2]  Li Yaoming,et al.  Trajectory tracking of particle material motion on sieve surface based on Mean shift algorithm. , 2009 .

[3]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[4]  H. Landry,et al.  Discrete element modeling of machine-manure interactions , 2006 .

[5]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Fuzzy control of the cleaning process on a combine harvester , 2010 .

[6]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  A genetic input selection methodology for identification of the cleaning process on a combine harvester, Part I: Selection of relevant input variables for identification of the sieve losses , 2007 .

[7]  Zhan Zhao,et al.  CFD-DEM simulation of material motion in air-and-screen cleaning device , 2012 .

[8]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  A genetic input selection methodology for identification of the cleaning process on a combine harvester, Part II: Selection of relevant input variables for identification of material other than grain (MOG) content in the grain bin , 2007 .

[9]  J. De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Discrete element modelling for process simulation in agriculture , 2003 .

[10]  Wang Chengjun,et al.  Design of multi-dimensional vibration screening test bench based on parallel mechanism. , 2012 .

[11]  C. González-Montellano,et al.  Discrete element modelling of grain flow in a planar silo: influence of simulation parameters , 2011 .

[12]  Yutaka Tsuji,et al.  Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluidized beds using the discrete element method (comparison between the two- and three-dimensional models) , 1998 .

[13]  Herman Ramon,et al.  Simulation of grain-straw separation by Discrete Element Modeling with bendable straw particles , 2014 .

[14]  Herman Ramon,et al.  DEM simulations of the particle flow on a centrifugal fertilizer spreader , 2009 .

[15]  F. Maio,et al.  Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes , 2004 .