Audit Sampling Research: A Synthesis and Implications for Future Research

SUMMARY: While research has influenced auditing standards for audit sampling, academic research provides limited insights into the current use of audit sampling. We synthesize relevant research based on a sampling decision framework and suggest areas for additional research. Important judgments include determining if sampling applies, what type of sampling to apply (e.g., attribute or monetary sampling), whether to use statistical or nonstatistical techniques, appropriate inputs to determine sample size, and evaluation of results, particularly when errors are observed in the sample. Several of these judgments may be influenced by environmental factors, such as regulation, litigation, competition, culture, and technology, and there are a number of research opportunities available in exploring how these environmental factors influence audit sampling decisions. Research indicates that auditors may underestimate risks and required assurance in order to reduce the extent of testing, although some of this resea...

[1]  Steven M. Glover,et al.  Error Rates, Error Projection, and Consideration of Sampling Risk: Audit Sampling Data from the Field , 2013 .

[2]  A. Wright,et al.  Investors', Auditors', and Lenders' Understanding of the Message Conveyed by the Standard Audit Report on the Financial Statements , 2012 .

[3]  Theodore J. Mock,et al.  Perceptions and Misperceptions Regarding the Unqualified Auditor's Report by Financial Statement Preparers, Users, and Auditors , 2011 .

[4]  James L. Colbert,et al.  Statistical or Non-Statistical Sampling: Which Approach Is Best? , 2011 .

[5]  Terri L. Herron,et al.  Audit Sampling Methods And Juror Negligence Awards: An Expectation Gap? , 2011 .

[6]  Arnold M. Wright,et al.  The World Has Changed—Have Analytical Procedure Practices? , 2010 .

[7]  Jeffrey J. Tsay,et al.  Modified Sieve Sampling: A Method for Single- and Multi-Stage Probability- Proportional-to-Size Sampling , 2010 .

[8]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  A Summary of Research and Enforcement Release Evidence on Confirmation Use and Effectiveness , 2008 .

[9]  Randal J. Elder,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Auditor Error Projection Decisions , 2005 .

[10]  Robert D. Allen,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Auditor Risk Assessments and Sample Size Decisions , 2003 .

[11]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Sampling Practices of Auditors in Public Accounting, Industry, and Government (Retracted) , 2002 .

[12]  Karla M. Zehms,et al.  Engagement Planning, Bid Pricing, and Client Response in the Market for Initial Attest Engagements , 2001 .

[13]  William F. Messier,et al.  An Experimental Assessment of Recent Professional Developments in Nonstatistical Audit Sampling Guidance , 2001 .

[14]  Terri L. Herron,et al.  The Effectiveness of Increasing Sample Size to Mitigate the Influence of Population Characteristics in Haphazard Sampling , 2001 .

[15]  J. Hunton,et al.  The Use of and Selection Biases Associated with Non Statistical Sampling In Auditing , 2000 .

[16]  Theodore J. Mock,et al.  Are Audit Program Plans Risk‐Adjusted? , 1999 .

[17]  Robert D. Allen,et al.  An empirical investigation of the auditor's decision to project errors , 1998 .

[18]  Steven M. Glover,et al.  Error Projection and Uncertainty in the Evaluation of Aggregate Error , 1997 .

[19]  Jane L. Reimers,et al.  Projecting Sample Misstatements to Audit Populations: Theoretical, Professional, and Empirical Considerations* , 1997 .

[20]  W. Knechel,et al.  Resource Allocation Decisions in Audit Engagements , 1997 .

[21]  Heather M. Hermanson.  The Effects of Audit Structure and Experience on Auditors' Decisions to Isolate Errors , 1997 .

[22]  T. B. O'keefe,et al.  The Production of Audit Services: Evidence from a Major Public Accounting Firm , 1994 .

[23]  Jane L. Reimers,et al.  The effect of containment information and error frequency on projection of sample errors , 1994 .

[24]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective , 1993 .

[25]  Jerry D. Sullivan,et al.  Litigation risk broadly considered , 1992 .

[26]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  The Bayesian and belief-function formalisms a general perspective for auditing , 1990 .

[27]  Wally J. Smieliauskas,et al.  On sample size allocation in auditing , 1988 .

[28]  Stephen A. Butler.  Application Of A Decision Aid In The Judgmental Evaluation Of Substantive Test Of Details Samples , 1985 .

[29]  John Neter,et al.  Bayesian Bounds for Monetary Unit Sampling in Accounting and Auditing , 1984 .

[30]  R. Plante,et al.  Implementation of Upper Multinomial Bound Using Clustering , 1981 .

[31]  Donald A. Leslie,et al.  Dollar Unit Sampling: A Practical Guide for Auditors , 1979 .

[32]  Richard A. Grimlund,et al.  A Sampling Model for Audit Tests of Composite Accounts , 1977 .

[33]  William R. Kinney,et al.  Judgmental evaluation of sample results: A study of the type and severity of errors made by practicing CPAs , 1977 .

[34]  John Neter,et al.  Behavior of major statistical estimators in sampling accounting populations : an empirical study , 1975 .

[35]  William R. Scott,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Asset Valuation and Audit Size , 1973 .

[36]  J. G. Birnberg,et al.  Bayesian Statistics - A Review , 1964 .