Architecture and built environment design education: disciplinary and pedagogical developments

The Dutch 4TU Centre for Engineering Education (CEE)1 has the mission to inspire, stimulate, support and disseminate effective and high-quality Engineering Education through research and the application of evidence-based innovations. It realises these goals by engineering education research, innovation and inspiration. Since 2 years the 4TU Centre for Engineering Education has joined forces with the departments of architecture and the built environment (AaBE) at the universities of technology in the Netherlands, and particularly at Delft University of Technology. In Delft, the ambition has been set to develop a portfolio for research-on-education innovation. The Delft AaBE faculty has chosen to create a research agenda for engineering education research, in which evidence-based working is becoming a standard practice.2 It aims to support and inspire teachers to innovate, monitor and systematically evaluate and improve their education. The 4TU CEE wholeheartedly supports this endeavour as it highly relates to the CEE mission of capacity building of engineering educators in higher education. Moreover, it integrates the three CEE primary pillars: engineering education research, innovation and dissemination. The AaBE faculty has become an experimental lab for sustainable change in engineering education with possibly long term impact on the quality of the (process of) educational innovation.

[1]  Simon Beausaert,et al.  Great Expectations: The Relationship Between Future Time Perspective, Learning from Others, and Employability , 2015 .

[2]  Ellen Sjoer,et al.  University teachers’ learning paths during technological innovation in education , 2018, International Journal for Academic Development.

[3]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research: Engineers as Problem Solvers , 2014 .

[4]  Kitty Kwakman,et al.  Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities , 2003 .

[5]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[6]  Thijs Asselbergs,et al.  Making explicit in design education: generic elements in the design process , 2011 .

[7]  Margaret C. Lohman.  Factors influencing teachers' engagement in informal learning activities , 2006 .

[8]  E. Wenger,et al.  Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[9]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation , 2018, European Planning Studies.

[10]  Monika Kurath,et al.  Architecture as a Science: Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Design Knowledge from Research , 2015 .

[11]  Donna S. Reese,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , 2014 .

[12]  C. Ansell,et al.  Varieties of Experimentalism , 2016 .

[13]  A. Kamp,et al.  Engineering Education in the Rapidly Changing World: Rethinking the Vision for Higher engineering Education , 2016 .