Development and validation of a visual body condition scoring system for dairy goats with picture-based training.

Body condition scoring (BCS) is the most widely used method to assess changes in body fat reserves, which reflects its high potential to be included in on-farm welfare assessment protocols. Currently used scoring systems in dairy goats require animal restraint for body palpation. In this study, the Animal Welfare Indicators project (AWIN) proposes to overcome this constraint by developing a scoring system based only on visual assessment. The AWIN visual body condition scoring system highlights representative animals from 3 categories: very thin, normal, and very fat, and was built from data sets with photographs of animals scored by a commonly used 6-point scoring system that requires palpation in 2 anatomical regions. Development of the AWIN scoring system required 3 steps: (1) identification and validation of a body region of interest; (2) sketching the region from photographs; and (3) creation of training material. The scoring system's reliability was statistically confirmed. An initial study identified features in the rump region from which we could compute a set of body measurements (i.e., measures based on anatomical references of the rump region) that showed a strong correlation with the assigned BCS. To validate the result, we collected a final data set from 171 goats. To account for variability in animal size and camera position, we mapped a subset of features to a standard template and aligned all the rump images before computing the body measurements. Scientific illustrations were created from the aligned images of animals identified as representative of each category to increase clarity and reproducibility. For training material, we created sketches representing the threshold between consecutive categories. Finally, we conducted 2 field reliability studies. In the first test, no training was given to 4 observers, whereas in the second, training using the threshold images was delivered to the same observers. In the first experiment, interobserver results was substantial, showing that the visual scoring system is clear and unambiguous. Moreover, results improved after training, reaching almost perfect agreement for the very fat category. The visual body condition scoring system is not only a practical tool for BCS in dairy goats but also shows potential to be fully automated, which would enhance its use in welfare assessment schemes and farm management.

[1]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  Patrice Perny,et al.  Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality® , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[3]  W. Revelle psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research , 2017 .

[4]  G. Alexandre,et al.  Body condition scoring of goats in extensive conditions , 1991 .

[5]  S. Walter,et al.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  D. M. Sherman,et al.  Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases , 2009 .

[7]  R. G. Gunn,et al.  Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep , 1969, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[8]  C. Lantz Application and evaluation of the kappa statistic in the design and interpretation of chiropractic clinical research. , 1997, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[9]  H. Spoolder,et al.  Development of a simplified Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs , 2012 .

[10]  E. Waclawski Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use , 2010 .

[11]  J M Bewley,et al.  Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  O. Maestrini,et al.  Body conditions of dairy goats in extensive systems of production : method of estimation , 1985 .

[13]  J D Ferguson,et al.  Body condition assessment using digital images. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  P. Morand-Fehr Recent developments in goat nutrition and application: A review , 2005 .

[15]  K. Butler,et al.  Relationship of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system to the mortality of Angora goats from hypothermia and their use in the assessment of welfare risks. , 2008, Australian veterinary journal.

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[18]  I Halachmi,et al.  Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  A. Weir,et al.  Using prevalence indices to aid interpretation and comparison of agreement ratings between two or more observers. , 2011, Veterinary journal.

[20]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  Model-structuring in public decision-aiding , 2005 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[22]  K. Anzuino,et al.  Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms based on direct observations , 2010, Veterinary Record.

[23]  J R Roche,et al.  Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  G. C. Guarnera,et al.  Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[26]  Jiří Matas,et al.  Computer Vision - ECCV 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[27]  D T Galligan,et al.  Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  G. Gebresenbet,et al.  Selection of Parameters for On-Farm Welfare-Assessment Protocols in Cattle and Buffalo , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[29]  Thomas B Farver,et al.  A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows , 1989 .

[30]  E. Kristensen,et al.  Within- and across-person uniformity of body condition scoring in Danish Holstein cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  P. E. Wagner,et al.  A Dairy Cow Body Condition Scoring System and Its Relationship to Selected Production Characteristics , 1982 .

[32]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[33]  Lantz Ca Application and evaluation of the kappa statistic in the design and interpretation of chiropractic clinical research. , 1997 .

[34]  S. Terramoccia,et al.  Determination of live weight and body condition score in lactating Mediterranean buffalo by Visual Image Analysis , 2008 .

[35]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Shape Matching and Recognition - Using Generative Models and Informative Features , 2004, ECCV.

[36]  F. Napolitano,et al.  Monitoring the on-farm welfare of sheep and goats , 2009 .

[37]  U. Knierim,et al.  On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach , 2009, Animal Welfare.