Modelling future uptake of distributed energy resources under alternative tariff structures

Current residential price tariff structures in Australia, which are predominately based on a flat daily supply charge combined with a per kWh electricity charge, create a distortion to the electricity consumption pattern, leading to larger afternoon and evening peak demands across the networks. Battery storage connected to solar PV (photovoltaic) array would reduce these effects in the presence of alternative price tariffs that incentivise households to shift load and reduce the peak demand. This challenge is addressed using a choice-diffusion model to forecast PV and battery storage uptake to 2025 for a case study in Townsville, Australia. Sensitivity of uptake is tested for six different price tariffs based on flat, time-of-use and critical-peak-pricing. Uptake of battery storage connected to solar PV ranged between 3% and 5.4% of households at 2025, depending on the price tariff, with the larger PV/battery options being more popular. Percentage of households disconnecting from the grid at 2025 is in the order of one percent depending on the price tariff. A sensitivity analysis showed battery price was a major driver to uptake whilst typical financial subsidies to purchase price have a lower effect.

[1]  Ricardo Rüther,et al.  Photovoltaics (PV) and electric vehicle-to-grid (V2G) strategies for peak demand reduction in urban regions in Brazil in a smart grid environment , 2014 .

[2]  Duk Bin Jun,et al.  A Choice-Based Multi-Brand Diffusion Model Incorporating Replacement Demand , 2011 .

[3]  Zhengen Ren,et al.  Spatio-temporal modelling of electric vehicle charging demand and impacts on peak household electrical load , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[4]  Zhengen Ren,et al.  A local-community-level, physically-based model of end-use energy consumption by Australian housing stock , 2012 .

[5]  Dong Chen,et al.  A model for predicting household end-use energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Australia , 2013 .

[6]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Price of Policy Risk - Empirical Insights from Choice Experiments with European Photovoltaic Project Developers , 2012 .

[7]  Queensland,et al.  Australian Statistical Geography Standard , 2011 .

[8]  Anna Stoppato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation , 2008 .

[9]  Christian-Simon Ernst,et al.  Battery sizing for serial plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: A model-based economic analysis for Germany , 2011 .

[10]  Kenju Akai,et al.  Prediction of photovoltaic and solar water heater diffusion and evaluation of promotion policies on the basis of consumers' choices , 2013 .

[11]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Modelling future uptake of solar photo-voltaics and water heaters under different government incentives , 2014 .

[12]  J. Sijm,et al.  The Performance of Feed-in Tariffs to Promote Renewable Electricity in European Countries , 2002 .

[13]  Seungmook Choi,et al.  A product diffusion model incorporating repeat purchases , 1985 .

[14]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments , 2010 .

[15]  Karen Herter Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity , 2007 .

[16]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[17]  V. Rudolf,et al.  Financial analysis of utility scale photovoltaic plants with battery energy storage , 2013 .

[18]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Modelling intervention options to reduce GHG emissions in housing stock — A diffusion approach , 2011 .

[19]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Accommodating Spatial Correlation Across Choice Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models: Application to Modeling Residential Location Choice Behavior , 2011 .

[20]  Y. Gagnon,et al.  An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment , 2010 .

[21]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables , 1994 .

[22]  Karen Herter,et al.  Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence , 2010 .

[23]  M. Guidolin,et al.  Cross-country diffusion of photovoltaic systems: Modelling choices and forecasts for national adoption patterns , 2010 .

[24]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[25]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A MIXED SPATIALLY CORRELATED LOGIT MODEL: FORMULATION AND APPLICATION TO RESIDENTIAL CHOICE MODELING , 2004 .

[26]  Thomas S. Brinsmead,et al.  Modelling the Future Grid Forum scenarios , 2013 .

[27]  Seongwon Seo,et al.  Decomposition and statistical analysis for regional electricity demand forecasting , 2012 .

[28]  D. Horsky,et al.  Advertising and the Diffusion of New Products , 1983 .