Evolution of Enterprise Competitiveness in Multiplex Networks of Standards: A Case Study of the Communication Industry in China

Competing to set industry standards is a strategic option to a variety of industries. This paper aims to investigate the role of standard drafting in the evolution of enterprises’ competitiveness in multiplex networks of standards. Specifically, network-based measurements are deliberately designed to evaluate the enterprises participation, contribution, and collaboration in drafting standards. By demonstrating the development of the standard system in China’s communication industry, the effectiveness of our measurement system is verified. Accompanied by empirical observation, the data analysis shows that the relevant governmental agencies dominate the whole standard system; basic-technology providers acquire greater competitiveness through participating in the standards drafting than the other kinds of enterprises. Finally, the corresponding managerial suggestions are offered.

[1]  Yang Li,et al.  Important institutions of interinstitutional scientific collaboration networks in materials science , 2018, Scientometrics.

[2]  Youngwon Park,et al.  Free trade agreements and maritime supply chain costs: Competitiveness of Korean firms , 2016 .

[3]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[5]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[6]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and Costs in International Competitiveness: From Countries and Sectors to Firms , 2014 .

[8]  Sun-Jen Huang,et al.  The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.

[9]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology , 2017, Scientometrics.

[10]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies' Patent Portfolios , 2009 .

[11]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs , 2010 .

[12]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[13]  C. Rammer,et al.  Does Energy Policy Hurt International Competitiveness of Firms? A Comparative Study for Germany, Switzerland and Austria , 2016 .

[14]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[15]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  A multiple criteria group decision-making approach for the assessment of small and medium-sized enterprise competitiveness , 2019, Management Decision.

[16]  B. Mahy,et al.  Short Notice, Big Difference? The Effect of Temporary Employment on Firm Competitiveness Across Sectors , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Peng Liu,et al.  Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field , 2014, Scientometrics.

[18]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[19]  Song Yang,et al.  Cohesiveness or competitiveness: Venture capital syndication networks and firms' performance in China , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[20]  Daphne W. Yiu,et al.  China Business at a Crossroads: Institutions, Innovation, and International Competitiveness , 2016 .

[21]  Alina Kadyrova,et al.  How the analysis of transitionary references in knowledge networks and their centrality characteristics helps in understanding the genesis of growing technology areas , 2017, Scientometrics.

[22]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[23]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Effects of standardization on the evolution of information and communications technology , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[25]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[26]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Patenting motives, technology strategies, and open innovation , 2017 .

[27]  Liwei Zhang,et al.  Proximal advantage in knowledge diffusion: The time dimension , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[28]  Kun Ding,et al.  Identifying and tracking scientific and technological knowledge memes from citation networks of publications and patents , 2018, Scientometrics.

[29]  Eoin O'Sullivan,et al.  Strategic standardisation of smart systems: A roadmapping process in support of innovation , 2017 .

[30]  D. Price.  Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography , 1965 .

[31]  D. Teece.  Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[32]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  Environmental Management and Firm Competitiveness: The Joint Analysis of External and Internal Elements , 2016 .

[33]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks , 1985, Scientometrics.

[34]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield , 2017, Scientometrics.

[35]  Sujin Choi,et al.  The triple helix and international collaboration in science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Junmo Kim,et al.  Mapping extended technological trajectories: integration of main path, derivative paths, and technology junctures , 2018, Scientometrics.

[37]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  V. Květoň,et al.  The effect of public R&D subsidies on firms' competitiveness: Regional and sectoral specifics in emerging innovation systems , 2018 .

[39]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The structure and dynamics of networks of scientific collaborations in Northern Africa , 2015, Scientometrics.

[40]  Francis Narin,et al.  Patent bibliometrics , 2005, Scientometrics.

[41]  A. Simonov,et al.  Captive finance and firm's competitiveness☆ , 2016 .

[42]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Fang-I. Kuo,et al.  Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance , 2016 .

[44]  Thomas W. Pike.  Collaboration networks and scientific impact among behavioral ecologists , 2010 .

[45]  D. Cases,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .

[46]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[47]  J. Solleiro,et al.  Competitiveness and innovation systems: the challenges for Mexico's insertion in the global context , 2005 .

[48]  Valeria Costantini,et al.  On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports , 2012 .

[49]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[50]  Virginia Barba-Sánchez,et al.  A STUDY OF THE VALUE OF ICT IN IMPROVING CORPORATE PERFORMANCE: A CORPORATE COMPETITIVENESS VIEW , 2018, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[51]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Interplay of innovation and standardization: Exploring the relevance in developing countries , 2017 .

[52]  G. Pisano.  Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution , 2006 .

[53]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? , 2014, Nature.

[54]  David A. Muñoz,et al.  Assessing Collaboration Networks in Educational Research: A Co-Authorship-Based Social Network Analysis Approach. , 2016 .

[55]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[56]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Structural properties and inter-organizational knowledge flows of patent citation network: The case of organic solar cells , 2016 .

[57]  Weiyong Zhang,et al.  The coupling relationship between standard development and technology advancement: A game theoretical perspective , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[58]  Richard Van Noorden,et al.  The top 100 papers , 2014, Nature.

[59]  Jiang Li,et al.  Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences , 2015, Scientometrics.

[60]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[61]  Knut Blind,et al.  The influence of strategic patenting on companies' patent portfolios , 2009 .

[62]  Laura Maria Ferri,et al.  Socially and environmentally responsible purchasing: Comparing the impacts on buying firm's financial performance, competitiveness and risk , 2018 .

[63]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm , 2006, J. Informetrics.