Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: two implementations in higher education

Asynchronous conferencing is emerging as a tool that can create opportunities for collaboration and support the inquiry process. This paper describes one such tool (ACT) designed within a specific pedagogical framework. The overall goal of ACT is to make cognitive processes visible and encourage reflection in students as they engage in critical thinking activities. This study examines the use of ACT within a graduate-level seminar and an upper-level undergraduate sociology course. The paper reports on the tasks assigned to the students, levels of participation, and ways in which special features of ACT helped support specific pedagogical goals in the two courses. Using ACT helped the instructors meet their goals; in both cases, they reported that students displayed better critical thinking skills than in past semesters. Most interesting was the use of labels; textual, color-coded tags associated with each message. Sets of labels defined by the instructors successfully facilitated specific student activities and promoted reflection.

[1]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An analysis of the effects of mode of communication on group decision making , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  John Brooks,et al.  In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms , 1993 .

[3]  B. Shneiderman.  Sparks of Innovation in Human-Computer Interaction , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[5]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representations for Scaffolding Collaborative Inquiry on Ill-Structured Problems. , 1998 .

[6]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment , 1990 .

[7]  B. Wilson.  Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[8]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology , 2001 .

[9]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  The Implications of Teaching Norms for the Improvement of Undergraduate Education in Teaching-Oriented Colleges. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. , 1996 .

[10]  Judith B. Harris.  Telecommunications Training by Immersion: University Courses Online , 1994 .

[11]  A. Astin.  What Matters In College , 1993 .

[12]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[13]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[14]  Claudia E. Nunn,et al.  Discussion in the College Classroom: Triangulating Observational and Survey Results. , 1996 .

[15]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[16]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[17]  Amos Israeli,et al.  Self-stabilization of dynamic systems assuming only read/write atomicity , 1990, PODC '90.

[18]  Margaret Riel,et al.  Research Perspectives on Network Learning , 1994 .

[19]  Laura M. Ventimiglia.  Cooperative Learning at the College Level. , 1994 .

[20]  Brad Mehlenbacher,et al.  Online Help: Design and Evaluation , 1999 .

[21]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Virtual-U™: a web-based environment customized to support collaborative learning and knowledge building in post secondary courses , 1996 .

[22]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Integrating and guiding collaboration: lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at Georgia Tech , 1997, CSCL.

[23]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .