Maestro: The INTO-CPS co-simulation framework

Abstract Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) often operate in a critical context where it is crucial that they behave as intended. However, the heterogeneous nature of CPSs makes them inherently challenging to develop. To assist in the development process, one can perform co-simulation, where models of constituents of a CPS are coupled to jointly simulate the full system. The challenge herein is to combine heterogeneous formalisms in a sound fashion and address practical needs such as stability, performance, platform compatibility and so forth. To address this, Maestro is a tool for co-simulation using models adhering to the Functional Mock-up Interface standard for co-simulation. Its development was driven by needs from different industry domains such as railways, agriculture, building automation and automotive. It supports both a fixed and variable constraint-based iteration scheme along with platform distribution capabilities. The tool is open-source as an attempt to increase adoption of co-simulation and encourage researchers to collaborate. Maestro has been validated by industry through application in the aforementioned domains. It is a step in the direction of the two-folded long-term goals: ensure trustworthy co-simulation results and make co-simulation a technology taken for granted.

[1]  Peter Gorm Larsen,et al.  Development of a Driverless Lawn Mower Using Co-simulation , 2017, SEFM Workshops.

[2]  Martin Arnold,et al.  Error Analysis and Error Estimates for Co-Simulation in FMI for Model Exchange and Co-Simulation V2.0 , 2013 .

[3]  Pasquale Antonante,et al.  Lessons Learned Using FMI Co-simulation for Model-Based Design of Cyber Physical Systems , 2018, ISoLA.

[4]  Jim Woodcock,et al.  Cyber-Physical Systems Design: Formal Foundations, Methods and Integrated Tool Chains , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering.

[5]  Niki Popper,et al.  On the terminology and structuring of co-simulation methods , 2017, EOOLT.

[6]  Peter Gorm Larsen,et al.  A Discrete Event-first Approach to Collaborative Modelling of Cyber-Physical Systems , 2018 .

[7]  Stéphane Vialle,et al.  FMI-based distributed multi-simulation with DACCOSIM , 2015, SpringSim.

[8]  Jozef Hooman,et al.  Co-simulation of cyber-physical systems using HLA , 2017, 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC).

[9]  David Broman,et al.  Requirements for hybrid cosimulation standards , 2015, HSCC.

[10]  C. Lokhorst,et al.  Book of abstracts of the European Conference on Agricultural Engineering AgEng2018 : 8-12 July, 2018, Wageningen, The Netherlands , 2018 .

[11]  David Broman,et al.  Hybrid co-simulation: it’s about time , 2018, Software & Systems Modeling.

[12]  Simon Foster,et al.  Towards Semantically Integrated Models and Tools for Cyber-Physical Systems Design , 2016, ISoLA.

[13]  Peter Schneider,et al.  Master for Co-Simulation Using FMI , 2011 .

[14]  David Broman,et al.  Co-simulation: State of the art , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  Gabor Karsai,et al.  Model-Based Integration Platform for FMI Co-Simulation and Heter- ogeneous Simulations of Cyber-Physical Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Elizabeth Latronico,et al.  System Design, Modeling, and Simulation Using Ptolemy Ii Ontologies , 2013 .

[17]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[18]  David Broman,et al.  Determinate composition of FMUs for co-simulation , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT).

[19]  Casper Thule,et al.  Semantic adaptation for FMI co-simulation with hierarchical simulators , 2019, Simul..

[20]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Hybrid simulation using implicit solver coupling with HLA and FMI , 2017, Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput..

[21]  Jos Höll,et al.  Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems in the Automotive Context: Case Study of a Range Prediction Assistant , 2018, ISoLA.

[22]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The 4+1 View Model of Architecture , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[23]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  FIDE: an FMI integrated development environment , 2016, SAC.

[24]  Martin Benedikt,et al.  Automated configuration for non-iterative co-simulation , 2016, 2016 17th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE).

[25]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Two Methods of Simulator Coupling , 2000 .

[26]  Peter Gorm Larsen,et al.  Formalising and Validating the Interface Description in the FMI Standard , 2016, FM.

[27]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Cosimulation of Intelligent Power Systems: Fundamentals, Software Architecture, Numerics, and Coupling , 2017, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[28]  Alois Zoitl,et al.  Enable Co-Simulation for Industrial Automation by an FMU Exporter for IEC 61499 Models , 2018, 2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[29]  David Broman,et al.  Co-Simulation , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[30]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[31]  Eilif Pedersen,et al.  Energy conservation and power bonds in co-simulations: non-iterative adaptive step size control and error estimation , 2016, Engineering with Computers.