Modeling hazardous fire potential within a completed fuel treatment network in the northern Sierra Nevada

We built on previous work by performing a more in-depth examination of a completed landscape fuel treatment network. Our specific objectives were: (1) model hazardous fire potential with and without the treatment network, (2) project hazardous fire potential over several decades to assess fuel treatment network longevity, and (3) assess fuel treatment effectiveness and longevity over a range of two critical fire modeling inputs: surface fuel models and canopy base height. Modeling results demonstrate reductions in the hazardous fire potential across much of the treated landscape, relative to the untreated condition. These reductions persist throughout our modeling duration, 2010–2050. However, there was a strong effect of varying ingrowth levels, which were manipulated to generate different estimates of canopy base height over time, on hazardous fire potential over time. Under the low ingrowth level, which resulted in the highest predictions of canopy base height, hazardous fire potential steadily declined over time for the untreated landscape condition. The effect of varying fuel models in treated areas had much less impact on hazardous fire potential, indicating a robust treatment effect. Our results demonstrate a coordinated fuel treatment network that incorporates local knowledge of fire weather and likely fire behavior patterns can have a substantial impact on reducing hazardous fire potential. However, even with planned maintenance of the treatment network, hazard grows in untreated areas over time, resulting in an increase in overall fire hazard. This suggests additional treatments, including fire use, would be necessary to maintain low hazardous fire potential.

[1]  S. Stephens,et al.  Development of Vegetation and Surface Fuels Following Fire Hazard Reduction Treatment , 2012 .

[2]  M. Finney,et al.  Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA , 2007 .

[3]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  The effectiveness and limitations of fuel modeling using the Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. , 2014 .

[4]  M. Finney.  Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[5]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project final report to Congress , 1997 .

[6]  B. C. Ward,et al.  Simulating landscape-scale effects of fuels treatments in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2011 .

[7]  C. Skinner,et al.  An Assessment of Factors Associated with Damage to Tree Crowns from the 1987 Wildfires in Northern California , 1995, Forest Science.

[8]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras , 2005 .

[9]  Miguel G. Cruz,et al.  Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies. , 2010 .

[10]  Allan A. Schoenherr.  A natural history of California , 1992 .

[11]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  An overview of the fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator , 2000 .

[12]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments , 2001 .

[13]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Height of Crown Scorch in Forest Fires , 1973 .

[14]  K. Blonski,et al.  Photo series for quantifying natural forest residues: southern Cascades and northern Sierra Nevada , 1981 .

[15]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires , 2006 .

[16]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  Incorporating landscape fuel treatment modeling into the Forest Vegetation Simulator , 2008 .

[17]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Fuel treatments and fire severity: A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[18]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations , 2006 .

[19]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fire Climbing in the Forest: A Semiqualitative, Semiquantitative Approach to Assessing Ladder Fuel Hazards , 2007 .

[20]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel?s Surface Fire Spread Model , 2015 .

[21]  S. Stephens,et al.  Fire history and climate influences from forests in the Northern Sierra Nevada, USA , 2006 .

[22]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area , 2009, Ecosystems.

[23]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. , 1996 .

[24]  G. E. Dixon.  Essential FVS: A User's Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator , 2007 .

[25]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  Overview and example application of the Landscape Treatment Designer , 2012 .

[26]  S. Stephens,et al.  Fuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest , 2012 .

[27]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Assessments and scientific basis for management options , 1996 .

[28]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Challenges and Approaches in Planning Fuel Treatments across Fire-Excluded Forested Landscapes , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[29]  Andrew J. McMahan,et al.  Restoration of fire in managed forests: a model to prioritize landscapes and analyze tradeoffs , 2013 .

[30]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) , 2007 .

[31]  Thomas T. Veblen,et al.  Forest fuel mapping and evaluation of LANDFIRE fuel maps in Boulder County, Colorado, USA. , 2009 .

[32]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure , 2010 .

[33]  R. Keane.  Describing wildland surface fuel loading for fire management: a review of approaches, methods and systems , 2013 .

[34]  Miguel G. Cruz,et al.  Are the applications of wildland fire behaviour models getting ahead of their evaluation again? , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Sonia A. Hall,et al.  Considerations for characterizing fuels as inputs for fire behavior models , 2006 .

[36]  J. Battles,et al.  Forest Composition, Structure, and Change in an Old-Growth Mixed Conifer Forest in the Northern Sierra Nevada , 1998 .

[37]  Brandon M. Collins,et al.  Fire and Fuels , 1975 .

[38]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[39]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  M. Finney.  Fire growth using minimum travel time methods , 2002 .

[41]  B. Davis,et al.  Quantifying the consequences of fire suppression in two California national parks , 2009 .

[42]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Using Fire to Increase the Scale, Benefits, and Future Maintenance of Fuels Treatments , 2012 .

[43]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires , 2005 .

[44]  James K. Brown.  Handbook for inventorying downed woody material , 1974 .

[45]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fuel treatment effects on modeled landscape- level fire behavior in the northern Sierra Nevada , 2010 .

[46]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Simulating Fire and Forest Dynamics for a Landscape Fuel Treatment Project in the Sierra Nevada , 2011, Forest Science.

[47]  Alan Bahro Ager,et al.  Automating the Fireshed Assessment Process with ArcGIS , 2006 .

[48]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. , 2000 .