Overcome the Conflict between Strength and Toughness in Poly(lactide) Nanocomposites through Tailoring Matrix-Filler Interface.

Strength and toughness are the two most important prerequisites for structural applications. Unfortunately, these two properties are often in conflict in materials. Here, an effective and yet practical strategy is proposed to simultaneously strengthen and toughen poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) using a simple rigid-rubber "reinforcing element." This element consists of a rigid graphene oxide (GO) sheet covalently coupled with poly(caprolactone-co-lactide) (PCLLA) rubbery layers, which can be easily synthesized and incorporated into PLLA matrix to develop composites with well-tailored GO/PLLA interfaces. It is demonstrated that by adding the "reinforcing element," i.e., GO-graft-rubber-graft-polyd-lactide), PLLA exhibits higher strength and higher toughness, which could be attributed to the synergy of rigid GO and rubbery PCLLA working in tandem during deformation. It is further demonstrated that this strategy can also be applied to other filler systems, such as clay and particulate polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane, and other polymer systems, such as poly(methyl methacrylate). The strategy could be considered as a general design principle for reinforcing materials where both strength and toughness are the key concerns.

[1]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  High Melt Strength and High Toughness PLLA/PBS Blends by Copolymerization and in Situ Reactive Compatibilization , 2017 .

[2]  Chen Si,et al.  Super-toughened poly(L-lactic acid) fabricated via reactive blending and interfacial compatibilization , 2016 .

[3]  Binghong Luo,et al.  Strengthening and toughening of poly(L-lactide) composites by surface modified MgO whiskers , 2015 .

[4]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  Biodegradable tough blends of poly(L-lactide) and poly(castor oil)–poly(L-lactide) copolymer , 2014 .

[5]  T. Iwata,et al.  Comparison of mechanical reinforcement effects of surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils and carbon nanotubes in PLLA composites , 2014 .

[6]  Mohamad G. Abiad,et al.  Toughening of poly(l-lactic acid) with Cu3BTC2 metal organic framework crystals , 2013 .

[7]  Chaobin He,et al.  Biodegradable “Core–Shell” Rubber Nanoparticles and Their Toughening of Poly(lactides) , 2013 .

[8]  Á. Alegría,et al.  Hydration and Dynamic State of Nanoconfined Polymer Layers Govern Toughness in Nacre‐mimetic Nanocomposites , 2013, Advanced materials.

[9]  S. Billington,et al.  A Renewable Lignin–Lactide Copolymer and Application in Biobased Composites , 2013 .

[10]  Jian Song,et al.  Study on biocompatible PLLA–PEG blends with high toughness and strength via pressure-induced-flow processing , 2013 .

[11]  Chaobin He,et al.  Rubber toughening of poly(lactic acid): Effect of stereocomplex formation at the rubber‐matrix interface , 2013 .

[12]  Vladimir V Tsukruk,et al.  Ultra‐Robust Graphene Oxide‐Silk Fibroin Nanocomposite Membranes , 2013, Advanced materials.

[13]  Chaobin He,et al.  Synthesis, stereocomplex crystallization, morphology and mechanical property of poly(lactide)–carbon nanotube nanocomposites , 2013 .

[14]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of nacre: a review , 2012 .

[15]  Jozef Adamcik,et al.  Biodegradable nanocomposites of amyloid fibrils and graphene with shape-memory and enzyme-sensing properties. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  Chaobin He,et al.  Synthesis and Stereocomplex Crystallization of Poly(lactide)-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites. , 2012, ACS macro letters.

[17]  Youngmee Jung,et al.  Stereocomplexation of Poly(L-lactide) and Random Copolymer Poly(D-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) To Enhance Melt Stability , 2012 .

[18]  Jianding Chen,et al.  Thermal and phase-separation behavior of injection-molded poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(d-lactic acid) blends with moderate optical purity , 2012, Polymer Bulletin.

[19]  E. Woo,et al.  Crystallization and morphology of stereocomplexes in nonequimolar mixtures of poly(l-lactic acid) with excess poly(d-lactic acid) , 2011 .

[20]  R. Ritchie.  The conflicts between strength and toughness. , 2011, Nature materials.

[21]  Le Hoang Sinh,et al.  Enhanced mechanical and electrical properties of polyimide film by graphene sheets via in situ polymerization , 2011 .

[22]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Highly Enhanced Nucleating Effect of Melt‐Recrystallized Stereocomplex Crystallites on Poly(L‐lactic acid) Crystallization , 2011 .

[23]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Homo‐ and hetero‐stereocomplexes of substituted poly(lactide)s as promising biodegradable crystallization‐accelerating agents of poly(L‐lactide) , 2011 .

[24]  Chen-Chi M. Ma,et al.  Preparation and properties of graphene oxide/polyimide composite films with low dielectric constant and ultrahigh strength via in situpolymerization , 2011 .

[25]  Xiaoming Yang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of layer-aligned poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene nanocomposites , 2010 .

[26]  Hongzhi Liu,et al.  Super Toughened Poly(lactic acid) Ternary Blends by Simultaneous Dynamic Vulcanization and Interfacial Compatibilization , 2010 .

[27]  Chaobin He,et al.  A DFT study on poly(lactic acid) polymorphs , 2010 .

[28]  Siew Yee Wong,et al.  Multi-walled carbon nanotube/polyimide composite film fabricated through electrophoretic deposition , 2010 .

[29]  R. Ruoff,et al.  The chemistry of graphene oxide. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[30]  N. Kotov,et al.  Multiparameter structural optimization of single-walled carbon nanotube composites: toward record strength, stiffness, and toughness. , 2009, ACS Nano.

[31]  A. Mohanty,et al.  Modification of brittle polylactide by novel hyperbranched polymer-based nanostructures. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[32]  N. Kotov,et al.  Fusion of Seashell Nacre and Marine Bioadhesive Analogs: High‐Strength Nanocomposite by Layer‐by‐Layer Assembly of Clay and L‐3,4‐Dihydroxyphenylalanine Polymer , 2007 .

[33]  I. Daniel,et al.  Mechanical and thermal behavior of clay/epoxy nanocomposites , 2006 .

[34]  Il Keun Kwon,et al.  Mechano-active scaffold design based on microporous poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) for articular cartilage tissue engineering: dependence of porosity on compression force-applied mechanical behaviors. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[35]  Hideto Tsuji,et al.  Poly(lactide) stereocomplexes: formation, structure, properties, degradation, and applications. , 2005, Macromolecular bioscience.

[36]  K. Bornhorst,et al.  Bismuth(III) n-Hexanoate and Tin(II) 2-Ethylhexanoate Initiated Copolymerizations of ε-Caprolactone and l-Lactide , 2005 .

[37]  R. Mülhaupt,et al.  Reactive core/shell type hyperbranched blockcopolyethers as new liquid rubbers for epoxy toughening , 2004 .

[38]  H. Kricheldorf,et al.  Polylactones, 68: Star-shaped homo- and copolyesters derived from ε-caprolactone, L, L-lactide and trimethylene carbonate , 2004 .

[39]  Tsutomu Takeichi,et al.  Studies on thermal and mechanical properties of polyimide-clay nanocomposites , 2001 .

[40]  P. Gruber,et al.  Polylactic Acid Technology , 2000 .

[41]  Shen‐guo Wang,et al.  Synthesis, characterization and degradation of ABA block copolymer of l-lactide and ε-caprolactone , 2000 .

[42]  D. C. Lee,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of PS-clay nanocomposite by emulsion polymerization , 1999 .

[43]  M. F. Butler,et al.  In-Situ Deformation Studies of Rubber Toughened Poly(methyl methacrylate): Influence of Rubber Particle Concentration and Rubber Cross-Linking Density , 1998 .

[44]  Catia Bastioli,et al.  Effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties , 1996 .