In-situ single cell mechanical characterization of W303 Yeast cells inside Environmental-SEM

We present the environmental-SEM (ESEM)-nanomanipulator system for in-situ measurement of mechanical properties of the yeast cells (W303 strain). This enhanced ESEM system comprises of a standard ESEM instrument as a nano imaging tool, a cooling stage as a cellular biology's humidity controller and 7 D.O.F. linear actuators as nanomanipulator/effector. Two types of experiments have been conducted, i.e. mechanical properties of individual yeast cells and forces on cell-substrate area. Different kinds of spring constants (0.02 N/m, 0.09 N/m and 0.7 N/m) and tip's shapes (sharp, flat and needle-like) of the cantilevers have been used during the experiments. From the analysis, the compressed forces needed to penetrate the cell wall of the yeast cells using sharp and flat tips (0.02 N/m for both) are in the range of 87-278 nN and 57-207 nN respectively. Locality mechanical measurement has been performed using needle-like tip (0.09 N/m) on single-cell and mother-daughter cells where the elastic properties of the cells are in the range of 1.32-3.95 MPa. In addition to the above data, we have also investigated forces on cell-substrate area which can be divided into noncontact and contact forces. Under noncontact forces, average electrostatic forces between Au tip-Al substrate and tip-cell surfaces are measured to be 16 plusmn 2 nN and 5 plusmn 2 nN respectively. While under contact forces, two types of surface adhesions are measured which are cantilever's tip-wet surface adhesion and cell-surface adhesion where the release forces for each adhesion are 1107 plusmn 129 nN and 26578 nN respectively.

[1]  A. Gliozzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of single living cells encapsulated in polyelectrolyte matrixes. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[2]  Chikashi Nakamura,et al.  Gene expression using an ultrathin needle enabling accurate displacement and low invasiveness. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  S. N. Kundra Toward the emergence of nanoneurosurgery: part III-nanomedicine: targeted nanotherapy, nanosurgery and progress toward the realization of nanoneurosurgery. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  Nanotechnological approaches for the delivery of macromolecules. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interactions , 2006 .

[6]  David Barlam,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of isolated tectorial membrane using atomic force microscopy , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  George K Stylios,et al.  Applications of nanotechnologies in medical practice. , 2005, Injury.

[8]  V. Labhasetwar Nanotechnology for drug and gene therapy: the importance of understanding molecular mechanisms of delivery. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[10]  Miriam B Goodman,et al.  Molecules and Mechanisms of Mechanotransduction , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Mette Ebbesen,et al.  Nanomedicine: Techniques, Potentials, and Ethical Implications , 2006, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[12]  S. Sahoo,et al.  Nanotech approaches to drug delivery and imaging. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Andre Boorsma,et al.  Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Yeast.

[14]  Indrajit Roy,et al.  Ceramic-based nanoparticles entrapping water-insoluble photosensitizing anticancer drugs: a novel drug-carrier system for photodynamic therapy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  E O Pettersen,et al.  Cell adhesion force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[17]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Chikashi Nakamura,et al.  A molecular delivery system by using AFM and nanoneedle. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  Chikashi Nakamura,et al.  Nanoscale operation of a living cell using an atomic force microscope with a nanoneedle. , 2005, Nano letters.

[20]  F. Arai,et al.  In situ measurement of Young's modulus of carbon nanotubes inside a TEM through a hybrid nanorobotic manipulation system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[21]  H. Atkinson,et al.  In Situ Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) of Semi-Solid Samples , 2006 .

[22]  K E Moxham,et al.  The mechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Chikashi Nakamura,et al.  Mechanical sensing of the penetration of various nanoneedles into a living cell using atomic force microscopy. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[24]  Andrew E. Pelling,et al.  Local Nanomechanical Motion of the Cell Wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Science.

[25]  M. Prato,et al.  Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[26]  K. Möller,et al.  Monitoring dynamics of electrode reactions in Li-ion batteries by in situ ESEM , 2006 .