Productivity growth, R&D and the rôle of international collaborative agreements: some évidence for Belgian manufacturing companies

Using Belgian firm level data on R&D and productivity, this paper provides further evidence on the important role of knowledge in explaining performance at the firm level, by augmenting the classical productivity growth approach not only with own R&D expenditures, but also with R&D cooperation. Taking the view that co-operation in R&D gives access to external know-how, the paper provides a new view on the mechanisms through which R&D spillovers may impact firm's output growth. Given the small open character of the Belgian economy, we focus especially on international technology diffusion and the role of cooperation with partners abroad. Beyond own R&D, the analysis shows support for international R&D cooperation to significantly improve firm productivity growth and more in particular, international cooperation with customers, suppliers or other companies, which reflects more applied international R&D co-operative activities. We further explored the role of international co-operative agreements, and more particularly whether it is used as a mechanism to access externally available know- how. Our proxies for available external know-how which (foreign) cooperation would give access to, did not provide conclusive evidence on R&D cooperation as a channel of transfer for knowledge spillovers. Overall, international R&D co-operation significantly increases a firm's output growth. However, the exact mechanisms how this cooperation enhances firm performance need further investigation.

[1]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Are international R&D spillovers trade-related?: Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners , 1998 .

[2]  Knowledge Diffusion, Technological Innovation and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing , 2000 .

[3]  David T. Coe,et al.  Are There International R&D Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners?: A Response to Keller , 1999 .

[4]  P. Mohnen International R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth , 2001 .

[5]  D. Greenaway,et al.  Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK? , 2001 .

[6]  J. Markusen The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade , 1995 .

[7]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[8]  Kamal Saggi,et al.  Trade , Foreign Direct Investment , and International Technology Transfer : A Survey * , 2000 .

[9]  B. Cassiman,et al.  Product market objectives and the formation of research joint ventures , 1999 .

[10]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[11]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  The Origins of Endogenous Growth , 1994 .

[12]  M. Paul,et al.  ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1990 .

[13]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: an Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality , 1986 .

[14]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Innovations and Technological Spillovers , 1993 .

[15]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  International R&D Spillovers between U.S. And Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors , 1994 .

[17]  F. Scherer,et al.  Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows , 1984 .

[18]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[19]  A. Hoffmaister,et al.  Are There International R&D Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners?: A Response to Keller , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Y. Kinoshita R&D and Technology Spillovers Via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity , 2000 .

[21]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[22]  S. Globerman Foreign Direct Investment and `Spillover' Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries. , 1979 .

[23]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence* , 2003 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[25]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[26]  Michele Cincera,et al.  International R&D spillovers: a survey , 2001 .

[27]  John Duffy,et al.  A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation of the Aggregate Production Function Specification , 2000 .

[28]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Nonexplanation , 1988 .

[29]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy , 1997 .

[30]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology Across Borders? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[31]  Michele Cincera,et al.  Technological competition, economic performance and strategic behaviour of international firms , 2001 .

[32]  E. Strobl,et al.  Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta‐Analysis , 2001 .

[33]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers , 1988 .

[34]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Protection for Sale , 1992 .

[35]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[36]  A. Kokko,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Spillovers , 1998 .

[37]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[38]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  International R&D spillovers: A comment , 1998 .

[39]  F. Sjöholm,et al.  National and international spillovers from R&D: Comparing a neoclassical and an endogenous growth approach , 1998 .

[40]  R. Caves Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets , 1974 .

[41]  Israel Zang,et al.  Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity , 2000 .

[42]  E. Muller,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels , 1992 .

[43]  Seongjun Kim,et al.  International R&D Spillovers, Trade and Productivity in Major OECD Countries , 1996 .

[44]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[45]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Product Demand, Cost of Production, Spillovers, and the Social Rate of Return to R&D , 1991 .

[46]  A. Gambardella Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[47]  Michele Cincera,et al.  Exploring the Spillover Impact on Productivity of World-Wide Manufacturing Firms , 1998 .

[48]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[49]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[50]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[51]  Rikard Forslid,et al.  Multinationals, Endogenous Growth, and Technological Spillovers: Theory and Evidence , 2005 .

[52]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[53]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[54]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .