Stent Placement to Prevent Restenosis After Angioplasty in Small Coronary Arteries

Background—Lesions in small-diameter vessels (<3 mm) define a group with distinct clinical and morphological characteristics. There is an inverse relationship between vessel size and angiographic restenosis rate. This study assessed whether stents reduce angiographic restenosis in small coronary arteries compared with standard balloon angioplasty. Methods and Results—We randomly assigned 351 symptomatic patients needing dilatation of 1 native coronary vessel between 2.3 and 2.9 mm in size to angioplasty alone (n=182) or stent implantation (n=169). The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and target vessel revascularization in hospital and at 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of major in-hospital complications. There was a trend toward fewer in-hospital events in the stent group (3% versus 7.1% in angioplasty group, P =0.076). Crossovers to stent occurred in 37 patients (20.3%). Repeat angiography at 6-month follow-up was performed in 85.3% of patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 28% of the stent group and 32.9% of the angioplasty group (P =0.36). Target vessel revascularization was required in 17.8% versus 20.3% of patients (P =0.54), respectively. Conclusions—Stenting and standard coronary angioplasty are associated with equal restenosis rate in small coronary arteries. With a lower in-hospital complication rate, stenting may be a superior strategy in small vessels.

[1]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  ACC Expert Consensus document on coronary artery stents. Document of the American College of Cardiology. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis revisited: insights provided by quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, American heart journal.

[3]  P Serruys,et al.  Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  I. Palacios,et al.  Implications of small reference vessel diameter in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  Influence of Coronary Vessel Size on Renarrowing Process and Late Angiographic Outcome After Successful Balloon Angioplast , 1994, Circulation.

[6]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Kastrati,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Small Vessels in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease , 2000 .

[8]  J. Moses,et al.  Efficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  K. Teo,et al.  Primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in occluded coronary arteries: the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA). , 1999, Circulation.

[11]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  AlbertSchömig,et al.  Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement , 1998 .

[13]  J. Stauffer,et al.  Corrective use of the 2.5‐mm GFX stent for suboptimal angioplasty results in small coronary arteries , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  M. Morice,et al.  Stenting small coronary arteries. , 1999, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[15]  L. Muhlbaier,et al.  Outcomes following interventions in small coronary arteries with the use of hand-crimped Palmaz-Schatz stents. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  J. Reiber,et al.  Standardization of Central Off-Line Quantitative Image Analysis: Implications from Experiences with Quantitative Coronary Angiography , 2000, Heart Drug.

[17]  L. Bentivoglio Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  G. Stone,et al.  Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. A. Painter,et al.  Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries. , 2000, European heart journal.

[21]  T. Feldman,et al.  Acute and late outcome after use of 2.5‐mm intracoronary stents in small (< 2.5 mm) coronary arteries , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography: equipment and technical requirements , 1993 .