Offshoring attitudes, relational behaviours, and departmental culture

The success of IT offshoring depends to some extent on the working relationships between onshore and offshore colleagues. However, as part of an organisational department's culture, employees can hold different attitudes towards offshoring and towards their own offshore collaboration. Previous research suggests that such 'offshoring attitudes' can influence subgroup divides and thereby affect employees' motivation to build and maintain effective working relationships. Through a qualitative field study, this paper demonstrates how offshoring attitudes affected the relational behaviours of German IT developers towards their Indian offshore colleagues. Two prototypical, contrasting departmental cultures are identified with regard to German members' offshoring attitudes and associated relational behaviours. In particular, offshoring attitudes had an impact on Germans treating their Indian colleagues as team members versus suppliers, their intercultural communication, knowledge transfer, task transfer, and pinpointing of mistakes. The findings are interpreted with regard to Martin and Siehl's (1983) notion of 'enhancing' and 'countercultural' organisational subcultures. Implications for theory, practitioners and future research are outlined.

[1]  Eva Maaninen-Olsson,et al.  Knowledge integration in a multinational setting : a study of a transnational business project , 2009 .

[2]  Angelika Zimmermann,et al.  Collaborative IT Offshoring Relationships and Professional Role Identities: Reflections from a Field Study. , 2011 .

[3]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India , 2008, MIS Q..

[4]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[5]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[6]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. , 1983 .

[7]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[8]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[9]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Natalie Fenton,et al.  Global Capital, Local Resistance? , 2007 .

[11]  Nigel King,et al.  Using templates in the thematic analysis of text , 2004 .

[12]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[13]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain , 2001 .

[14]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[15]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  Markus Westner,et al.  Determinants of success in IS offshoring projects: Results from an empirical study of German companies , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[17]  김종식 동아시아 문화와 경영, Geert Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980) ; and Cultures and Organizations : Software of the Mind (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1997) , 1999 .

[18]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[20]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[21]  U. Secretariat World Investment Report 2005—Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D , 2006 .

[22]  A. Zimmermann Interpersonal Relationships in Transnational, Virtual Teams: Towards a Configurational Perspective , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  C. Gibson,et al.  Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research , 2005 .

[24]  Larry J. Shuman,et al.  Offshoring manufacturing: Implications for engineering jobs and education: A survey and case study , 2006 .

[25]  C. Mora Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival , 2013 .

[26]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[27]  I. Ajzen Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Dispelling Some Myths About Offshoring , 2006 .

[29]  M. Erez,et al.  A Dynamic, Multi‐Level Model of Culture: From the Micro Level of the Individual to the Macro Level of a Global Culture , 2004 .

[30]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Building an effective global business team , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[31]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain , 2003 .

[32]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups , 2010 .

[33]  N. Mankiw,et al.  The Politics and Economics of Offshore Outsourcing , 2006 .

[34]  K. Sauvant World Investment Report , 1999 .

[35]  P. Robertson,et al.  World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D , 2007 .

[36]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  Lived experiences of offshoring: An examination of UK and Indian financial service employees' accounts of themselves and one another , 2007 .