Intraoperative blood vessel detection and quantification: a Monte Carlo study

Abstract. With better surgical outcomes, quicker recovery times, decreased postoperative pain, and reduced scarring at the surgical site, the application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained a lot of prominence in the last 30 years. This change in surgical practice has taken away the ability of a surgeon to palpate for the presence of a blood vessel as would occur in an open procedure. They instead must rely on a laparoscopic video camera feed that unfortunately cannot detect the presence of a blood vessel hidden beneath tissue. In certain scenarios, a surgeon can accidentally cut a blood vessel, which can lead to severe, even fatal, complications. Here, we show that by adding a near-infrared LED and a photodiode onto the opposing jaws of laparoscopic graspers, blood vessels buried under tissue can be detected. We show the results of Monte Carlo simulations to support our theory that the blood vessels ranging from 3 to 6 mm buried under up to 1 cm of tissue can be detected and quantified. This technology could be added to already existing laparoscopic tools that have limited surface areas on the jaws to assist surgeons during MIS procedures.

[1]  Chandru P Sundaram,et al.  The use of a Doppler ultrasound probe during vascular dissection in laparoscopic renal surgery. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[2]  J. Wolf,et al.  Risk factors for conversion to hand assisted laparoscopy or open surgery during laparoscopic renal surgery. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Arridge,et al.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement , 1988 .

[4]  Jeffrey Hammond,et al.  Impact of bleeding-related complications and/or blood product transfusions on hospital costs in inpatient surgical patients , 2011, BMC health services research.

[5]  G. Rozycki,et al.  The history of ultrasound. , 1998, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[6]  Carl A. Nelson,et al.  Shortened OR time and decreased patient risk through use of a modular surgical instrument with artificial intelligence , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  Jon I. Einarsson,et al.  Updated Hysterectomy Surveillance and Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy , 2014, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  Randy S. Haluck,et al.  Laparoscopic Multifunctional Instruments: Design and Testing of Initial Prototypes , 2005, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[9]  George C Velmahos,et al.  The impact of major intraoperative adverse events on hospital readmissions. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[10]  Jin He,et al.  A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. , 2014, Surgery.

[11]  Stephen J. Matcher Signal Quantification and Localization in Tissue Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2016 .

[12]  S. Fantini,et al.  Comment on the modified Beer-Lambert law for scattering media. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  Coupling 3D Monte Carlo light transport in optically heterogeneous tissues to photoacoustic signal generation , 2014, Photoacoustics.

[14]  Peter A Pinto,et al.  Enhanced surgical imaging: laparoscopic vessel identification and assessment of tissue oxygenation. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.