Comparison of two different classifiers for mental tasks-based Brain-Computer Interface: MLP Neural Networks vs. Fuzzy Logic

This study is devoted to the classification of fourclass mental tasks data for a Brain-Computer Interface protocol. In such view we adopted Multi Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP) and Fuzzy C-means analysis for classifying: left and right hand movement imagination, mental subtraction operation and mental recitation of a nursery rhyme. Five subjects participated to the experiment in two sessions recorded in distinct days. Different parameters were considered for the evaluation of the performances of the two classifiers: accuracy, that is, percentage of correct classifications, training time and size of the training dataset. The results show that even if the accuracies of the two classifiers are quite similar, the MLP classifier needs a smaller training set to reach them with respect to the Fuzzy one. This leads to the preference of MLP for the classification of mental tasks in Brain Computer Interface protocols.

[1]  Ramaswamy Palaniappan,et al.  Neural network classification of autoregressive features from electroencephalogram signals for brain–computer interface design , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  M. Menard Extension of the objective functions in fuzzy clustering , 2002, 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ-IEEE'02. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37291).

[3]  Kazuyuki Hara,et al.  Comparison of activation functions in multilayer neural network for pattern classification , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[4]  G. E. Kelly,et al.  Supervised learning techniques for backpropagation networks , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[5]  C. Y. Chen,et al.  A multi-level backpropagation network for pattern recognition systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[6]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[8]  László T. Kóczy,et al.  Fuzzy rule interpolation for multidimensional input spaces with applications: a case study , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[9]  A. Lekova,et al.  Method for fuzzy rules extraction from numerical data , 1997, Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[11]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005 , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Tariq Samad,et al.  Effect of initial weights on back-propagation and its variations , 1989, Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  M. Fernandez-Redondo,et al.  Multilayer feedforward weight initialization , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[14]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[15]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Theory of the backpropagation neural network , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[17]  Ferenc Szeifert,et al.  Modified Gath-Geva fuzzy clustering for identification of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[18]  Shengrui Wang,et al.  An improved scheme for the fuzzifier in fuzzy clustering , 1997, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VII. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop.