Strategic orientation toward digitalization to improve innovation capability: why knowledge acquisition and exploitation through external embeddedness matter

Purpose This study aims to analyze the mediating effect of the open innovation processes of knowledge acquisition and exploitation as external embeddedness strategy on the relationships between strategic orientation toward digitalization and the three dimensions of the innovation capability: client, marketing and technology. Design/methodology/approach The research model was tested using a structural equation modeling design based on survey data from a financial and insurance sector multinational enterprise with direct operations in seven emerging countries. This sector is classified as being highly digitalized. Findings The results show that strategic orientation toward digitalization has an effect on innovation capability, with a greater impact on the client and technology dimensions than on the marketing dimension. However, the relationships with clients and technology are partially mediated by acquisition, while the one with marketing is mediated by exploitation. Originality/value This finding widens the current purpose and theoretical sense of external embeddedness as a type of inter-organizational arrangement key for digitalization in the literature, which is focused on the adaptation of digital technology of the head office to the needs of the subsidiaries and the systems of their local allies. By contrast, the study results show that external embeddedness is key for the multinational to be able, from its global way of creating value through digital technologies, not only to improve operating efficiency, but also to meet costumer experience expectations in each host country and innovate in local commercialization strategies, on account of the knowledge transfer between the multinational and the local players on customer preferences and technology uses in local markets.

[1]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  How Big Old Companies Navigate Digital Transformation , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[2]  Hui Lei,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  Dual relational embeddedness and knowledge transfer in European multinational corporations and subsidiaries , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Evangelia Katsikea,et al.  Strategic Orientations, Marketing Capabilities and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation in the Context of Frontline Managers in Service Organizations , 2012 .

[5]  Jizhen Li,et al.  Commercial partnerships and collaborative innovation in China: the moderating effect of technological uncertainty and dynamic capabilities , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Karl S.R. Warner,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[7]  Kee-hung Lai,et al.  Adopting an Open Innovation Program with Supply Chain Management in China: A Case Study , 2018 .

[8]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How MNC's subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Vijay Pereira,et al.  Investigating dynamic capabilities, agility and knowledge management within EMNEs-longitudinal evidence from Europe , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Seokwoo Song,et al.  Exploring effective work unit knowledge management (KM): roles of network, task, and KM strategies , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Luca Marinelli,et al.  The digital transformation of SMEs - a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Digital transformation of global business processes: the role of dual embeddedness , 2019, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[13]  Thijs Broekhuizen,et al.  Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda , 2021, Journal of Business Research.

[14]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[15]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations , 2019, Management Decision.

[16]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns , 2017, MIS Q..

[17]  Giovanni Perrone,et al.  Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow , 2015 .

[18]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[19]  Daniel Jimenez-Jimenez,et al.  The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Jose Arias-Perez,et al.  Triggering Open Innovation Processes Through Organizational Emotional Capability and Rival's Absorptive Capacity Orientation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  Daniel Jimenez-Jimenez,et al.  Journal of Knowledge Management Knowledge management practices for innovation : a multinational corporation ’ s perspective , 2014 .

[22]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Helle Alsted Søndergaard,et al.  Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices , 2014 .

[25]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNEs , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  M. Bogers,et al.  Exploring open innovation in the digital age: A maturity model and future research directions , 2020 .

[27]  Rogier van de Wetering,et al.  Examining the relationship between a hospital's IT infrastructure capability and digital capabilities: a resource-based perspective , 2018, AMCIS.

[28]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[29]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Emerging Multinationals Venturing Into Developed Economies: Implications for Learning, Unlearning, and Entrepreneurial Capability , 2011 .

[30]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment , 2017 .

[32]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation in Brazil: Exploring Opportunities and Challenges , 2019, International Journal of Professional Business Review.

[33]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation , 2014 .

[34]  Key Pousttchi,et al.  Technology Impact Types for Digital Transformation , 2019, 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

[35]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals , 2020 .

[36]  Bettina Maisch,et al.  Digitalization needs a cultural change – examples of applying Agility and Open Innovation to drive the digital transformation , 2019, Procedia CIRP.

[37]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation , 2019, Business Horizons.

[38]  In Lee,et al.  Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges , 2018 .

[39]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Creating and capturing value from Big Data: A multiple-case study analysis of provider companies , 2019, Technovation.

[40]  J. Arias-Pérez,et al.  NOT-INVENTED-HERE SYNDROME AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: THE CONFOUNDING EFFECT OF INNOVATION CAPABILITIES AS ORGANISATIONAL ROUTINES IN SERVICE FIRMS , 2017 .

[41]  Gregory Vial,et al.  Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Sabai Khin,et al.  Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance , 2019, International Journal of Innovation Science.

[43]  Janet R. McColl-Kennedy,et al.  Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development , 2011 .

[44]  Ying Lu,et al.  Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination , 2011, MIS Q..

[45]  Konstantinos G. Fouskas,et al.  The Impact Of Digital Transformation In The Financial Services Industry: Insights From An Open Innovation Initiative In Fintech In Greece , 2017, MCIS.

[46]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs , 2017 .

[47]  Atika A. Kemal,et al.  Mobile banking in the government-to-person payment sector for financial inclusion in Pakistan* , 2019, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[48]  J. Arias-Pérez,et al.  Information technology capabilities and organizational agility , 2019, Multinational Business Review.

[49]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox , 2020 .

[50]  Fábio Lotti Oliva,et al.  Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[51]  Sebastian Molinillo,et al.  Conceptualising a digital orientation: antecedents of supporting SME performance in the digital economy , 2018 .

[52]  Jianguo Yao,et al.  Knowledge sharing and technological innovation capabilities of Chinese software SMEs , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  Vito Albino,et al.  Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: a systematic literature review , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[54]  Philipp Barthel,et al.  Characterizing Approaches to Digital Transformation: Development of a Taxonomy of Digital Units , 2019, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[55]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[56]  J. Webb,et al.  Alliances in Financial Ecosystems: A Source of Organizational Legitimacy for Fintech Startups and Incumbents , 2019, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[57]  Eleni Lioliou,et al.  Environmental risks, localization and the overseas subsidiary performance of MNEs from an emerging economy , 2016 .

[58]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[59]  J. Moormann,et al.  Strategic Alliances between Banks and Fintechs for Digital Innovation: Motives to Collaborate and Types of Interaction , 2019, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance.

[60]  Anna Nosella,et al.  Tracing the evolution of the literature on knowledge management in inter-organizational contexts: a bibliometric analysis , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[61]  Diego Matricano,et al.  Absorbing in-bound knowledge within open innovation processes. The case of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..