Integrating monitoring and inspection with attached ultrasonic transducers

Ultrasonic methods are widely applied for nondestructive evaluation of structural components during both the manufacturing process and subsequent field inspections. The field inspections often require expensive teardown in order to access the back surfaces of critical components. Active ultrasonic methods are also a subject of ongoing research for structural health monitoring whereby transducers are permanently attached to a structure and signals are monitored to detect changes caused by structural damage. This paper presents a methodology for effectively combining ultrasonic monitoring and inspection. During the monitoring phase, detection and localization of possible damage is demonstrated on several specimens using attached transducers. This detection phase is followed by demonstration of a new inspection method referred to as Acoustic Wavefield Imaging (AWI) which utilizes the attached transducers as sources and a single externally scanned air-coupled transducer as a receiver. The acoustic wavefield images are useful for both checking the viability of the attached transducers and quantifying the extent of damage. The AWI method approaches the sensitivity of conventional through transmission ultrasonic methods but does not require access to both sides of structural components. Thus, it is very well suited for rapid field inspection of structural assemblies.

[1]  Krishnan Balasubramaniam,et al.  Plate waves structural health monitoring of composite structures , 2005 .

[2]  Massimo Ruzzene,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION IN PLATE STRUCTURES USING SPARSE ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCER ARRAYS AND ACOUSTIC WAVEFIELD IMAGING , 2005 .

[3]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Embedded-ultrasonics Structural Radar for In Situ Structural Health Monitoring of Thin-wall Structures , 2004 .

[4]  J. Michaels,et al.  A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations. , 2005, Ultrasonics.

[5]  D. Thompson,et al.  Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , 1982 .

[6]  J.E. Michaels,et al.  Detection of structural damage from the local temporal coherence of diffuse ultrasonic signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Seth Stovack Kessler,et al.  Piezoelectric-based in-situ damage detection of composite materials for structural health monitoring systems , 2002 .

[8]  T. Michaels,et al.  Sparse Ultrasonic Transducer Array for Structural Health Monitoring , 2004 .

[9]  Christian Boller,et al.  Next generation structural health monitoring and its integration into aircraft design , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Piezoelectric Wafer Embedded Active Sensors for Aging Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring , 2002 .

[11]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Guided Wave Tomography on an Aircraft Wing with Leave in Place Sensors , 2005 .

[12]  Jennifer E Michaels,et al.  An ultrasonic method for dynamic monitoring of fatigue crack initiation and growth. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[14]  Massimo Ruzzene,et al.  Simulation and Measurement of Ultrasonic Waves in Elastic Plates Using Laser Vibrometry , 2005 .

[15]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  Omni-directional guided wave transducer arrays for the rapid inspection of large areas of plate structures , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  Jennifer E. Michaels,et al.  Enhanced Differential Methods for Guided Wave Phased Array Imaging Using Spatially Distributed Piezoelectric Transducers , 2006 .