The Development of IT Suspicion as a Construct and Subsequent Measure

Abstract : Suspicion has not been studied in great depth; however, a conceptual understanding of suspicion is no less important than many of the other highly studied constructs related to healthy working relationships. Information technology (IT) is one area in which the study of suspicion is lacking. This thesis focuses on the specific domain of IT suspicion. An extensive study of the suspicion literature and the suspicion nomological net as well as informal surveys of the general population and subject matter experts were used to create an IT suspicion conceptual definition. A survey also was created to test IT suspicion's relationships with other more established constructs. The final pilot study consisted of two measures from the suspicion nomological net (i.e., locus of control and disposition to trust), a trait IT suspicion measure, a manipulation exercise on a laptop computer intended to induce suspicion, and a state suspicion measure. The analysis indicates that IT suspicion is a multi-dimensional construct with independent state and trait properties. The state and trait properties also have separate dimensions. Comparisons between the components of the IT suspicion construct and related measures indicate a negative correlation between state suspicion and locus of control.

[1]  T. Judge,et al.  THE CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS SCALE: DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE , 2003 .

[2]  S. Robbins Essentials of Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[3]  James B. Stiff,et al.  Truth Biases and Aroused Suspicion in Relational Deception , 1992 .

[4]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[5]  C. White,et al.  Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Effects of Suspicion on Communication Behaviors and Perceptions , 1996 .

[6]  Xin Li,et al.  Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  R. Edelman Some Variables Affecting Suspicion of Deception. , 1970 .

[9]  Timothy R. Hinkin A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[10]  D. Jackson,et al.  Suspicion of deception: implications for conformity research. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[12]  Randolph C. Arnau Second-Order Factor Analysis: Methods and Interpretation. , 1998 .

[13]  T. Levine,et al.  The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion , 1991 .

[14]  Linda K. Stroh,et al.  Good Definitions: The Epistemological Foundation of Scientific Progress , 2003 .

[15]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[16]  C. Pinder,et al.  Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior , 1997 .

[17]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[18]  H. Levenson 2 – DIFFERENTIATING AMONG INTERNALITY, POWERFUL OTHERS, AND CHANCE , 1981 .

[19]  D. Heretick,et al.  Trust-suspicion and gender differences in interpersonal functioning , 1984 .

[20]  Henri Barki,et al.  Thar's gold in them thar constructs , 2008, DATB.

[21]  Marino Bonaiuto,et al.  THE IMPACT OF DECEPTION AND SUSPICION ON DIFFERENT HAND MOVEMENTS , 2006 .

[22]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[23]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational behavior : the state of the science , 1994 .

[24]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Aaron M. Hoffman The Structural Causes of Trusting Relationships: Why Rivals Do Not Overcome Suspicion Step by Step , 2007 .

[26]  S. Fein Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .