Ultrasonographic quantification of spinal cord and dural pulsations during cervical laminoplasty in patients with compressive myelopathy

PurposePulsatile movements of the dura mater have been interpreted as a sign that the cord is free within the subarachnoid space, with no extrinsic compression. However, the association between restoration of pulsation and adequate decompression of the spinal cord has not been established. The present study investigated the relationship between the extent of spinal cord decompression and spinal cord and dural pulsations based on quantitative analysis of intraoperative ultrasonography (US).MethodsEighty-five consecutive patients (55 males, 30 females; mean age, 64 ± 13 years) who underwent cervical double-door laminoplasty to relieve compressive myelopathy were enrolled. Spinal cord decompression status was classified as: Type 1 (non-contact), the subarachnoid space was retained on the ventral side of the cord, Type 2 (contact and apart), the cord showed both contact with and separation from the anterior element of the cervical spine, or Type 3 (contact), the cord showed continuous contact with the anterior element of the cervical spine. Spinal cord and dura mater dynamics were quantitatively analyzed using automatic video-tracking software. Furthermore, the intensity of spinal and dural pulsation was compared with the recovery of motor function at 1 year after surgery as measured by increase in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ).ResultsSpinal cord pulsation amplitude ranged from 0.01 to 0.84 mm (mean 0.30 ± 0.16 mm) and dural pulsation amplitude ranged from 0.01 to 0.38 mm (mean 0.14 ± 0.08 mm). Average spinal cord pulsation amplitude in Type 2 patients was significantly larger than that in the other groups, whereas, average dural pulsation amplitudes were similar for all three groups. There was a significant correlation between spinal cord and dural pulsation amplitudes in Type 1 patients, but not in Type 2 or Type 3 patients. Type 3 patients showed a particularly poor correlation between spinal cord and dural pulsations. Spinal cord pulsation amplitude was moderately correlated with the recovery of motor function evaluated by JOACMEQ.ConclusionThe present results suggest that restoration of dural pulsation is not an adequate indicator of sufficient decompression of the spinal cord following a surgical procedure.

[1]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  The Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation , 2009 .

[2]  H. Boehm,et al.  A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[3]  T. Tsuji,et al.  Retrospective cohort study between selective and standard C3-7 laminoplasty. Minimum 2-year follow-up study , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of posterior decompression via laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: correlation with 2-year follow-up results. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  A. Minamide,et al.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[6]  Y. Yukawa,et al.  Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[7]  紺野愼一,et al.  日本整形外科学会腰痛評価質問票JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire(JOABPEQ)/日本整形外科学会頚部脊髄症評価質問票JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire(JOACMEQ)作成報告書(平成19年4月16日) , 2008 .

[8]  C J Hardy,et al.  Brain and cerebrospinal fluid motion: real-time quantification with M-mode MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  Y. Yato,et al.  Results of Skip Laminectomy—Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study Compared With Open-Door Laminoplasty , 2003, Spine.

[10]  R. Quencer,et al.  Normal intraoperative spinal sonography. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  N J Pelc,et al.  Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  Y. Matsuyama,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Results of Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Focusing on Spinal Cord Motion in Intraoperative Ultrasonography and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, Spine.

[13]  H. Sakai,et al.  Comparison of enlargement of the spinal canal after cervical laminoplasty: open-door type and double-door type , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[14]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) The report on the development of revised versions April 16, 2007 , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[15]  Y. Hoshino,et al.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[16]  H. Mihara,et al.  Spinal Cord Morphology and Dynamics During Cervical Laminoplasty: Evaluation With Intraoperative Sonography , 2007, Spine.

[17]  J. Rubin,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasonic evaluation of spinal cord motion. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.