An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments

Abstract Geotechnical engineers face several challenges when constructing embankments over soft soils. These include potential bearing failure, intolerable settlement, and global or local instability. Piled embankments provide an economic and effective method to construct roads on soft soils. Soil arching developed within such embankments has significant influence on its behavior. A total of 15 model tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of pile–subsoil relative displacement, embankment height, cap beam width and clear spacing, and geosynthetics with different tensile strengths on stress concentration ratios and settlements in the embankments. The test results indicate that stress concentration ratio varies with pile–subsoil relative displacement and has upper and lower bounds. A higher ratio of embankment height to cap beam clear spacing, as well as a higher ratio of cap beam width to clear spacing, would result in a higher stress concentration ratio. The inclusion of a geosynthetic membrane can increase the stress concentration ratio. When the embankment height to the cap beam clear spacing ratio, h/s, is less than 1.4, apparent differential settlements may occur on the surface of embankment. When h/s is greater than 1.6, however, no apparent differential settlements will occur on the embankment surface. In addition, experimental results were also compared to several current design methods.

[1]  Jie Han,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Earth Platforms over Soft Soil , 2002 .

[2]  K. Terzaghi Theoretical Soil Mechanics , 1943 .

[3]  Muhannad T. Suleiman,et al.  NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC-RAMMED AGGREGATE PIER SUPPORTED EMBANKMENTS , 2004 .

[4]  Patrick J. Naughton,et al.  Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Analysis Design Methods for Piled Embankments , 2005 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Magnan,et al.  Methods to Reduce the Settlement of Embankments on Soft Clay: A Review , 1994 .

[6]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation , 2006 .

[7]  M. Bolton THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[8]  Sarah M. Springman,et al.  Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade , 2006 .

[9]  Mohammed A. Gabr,et al.  Geosynthetic Reinforcement for Soft Foundations: US Perspectives , 2005 .

[10]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Analysis of field performance of embankments on soft clay deposit with and without PVD-improvement , 2005 .

[11]  George M. Filz,et al.  Influence of Clay Compressibility on Geosynthetic Loads in Bridging Layers for Column-Supported Embankments , 2005 .

[12]  J. G. Collin,et al.  Full Scale Highway Load Test of Flexible Pavement Systems with Geogrid Reinforced Base Courses , 1996 .

[13]  Jl Xu,et al.  Method for Highway Safety Design on Computer Simulation , 2004 .

[14]  D Russell,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN METHODS FOR PILED EMBANKMENTS , 1997 .

[15]  V. Choa,et al.  Arching in Piled Embankments , 1994 .