A review of the design and clinical evaluation of the ShefStim array-based functional electrical stimulation system.

Functional electrical stimulation has been shown to be a safe and effective means of correcting foot drop of central neurological origin. Current surface-based devices typically consist of a single channel stimulator, a sensor for determining gait phase and a cuff, within which is housed the anode and cathode. The cuff-mounted electrode design reduces the likelihood of large errors in electrode placement, but the user is still fully responsible for selecting the correct stimulation level each time the system is donned. Researchers have investigated different approaches to automating aspects of setup and/or use, including recent promising work based on iterative learning techniques. This paper reports on the design and clinical evaluation of an electrode array-based FES system for the correction of drop foot, ShefStim. The paper reviews the design process from proof of concept lab-based study, through modelling of the array geometry and interface layer to array search algorithm development. Finally, the paper summarises two clinical studies involving patients with drop foot. The results suggest that the ShefStim system with automated setup produces results which are comparable with clinician setup of conventional systems. Further, the final study demonstrated that patients can use the system without clinical supervision. When used unsupervised, setup time was 14min (9min for automated search plus 5min for donning the equipment), although this figure could be reduced significantly with relatively minor changes to the design.

[1]  P. Helliwell,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics at the ankle joint complex in rheumatoid arthritis patients with painful valgus deformity of the rearfoot. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[2]  Ning Sha A surface electrode array-based system for functional electrical stimulation , 2008 .

[3]  D. Howard,et al.  A finite element model to identify electrode influence on current distribution in the skin. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[4]  D. Howard,et al.  The effect of the impedance of a thin hydrogel electrode on sensation during functional electrical stimulation. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  Francis A. Duck,et al.  Physical properties of tissue : a comprehensive reference book , 1990 .

[6]  Susan Coote,et al.  Surface-applied functional electrical stimulation for orthotic and therapeutic treatment of drop-foot after stroke – a systematic review , 2009 .

[7]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Array electrode design for transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a simulation study. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Joerg Raisch,et al.  Iterative Learning Control of Drop Foot Stimulation with Array Electrodes for Selective Muscle Activation , 2014 .

[9]  Jörg Raisch,et al.  Iterative learning control of a drop foot neuroprosthesis — Generating physiological foot motion in paretic gait by automatic feedback control , 2016 .

[10]  Steve Beeby,et al.  Screen printed fabric electrode array for wearable functional electrical stimulation , 2014 .

[11]  J. Harris,et al.  Review of therapeutic electrical stimulation for dorsiflexion assist and orthotic substitution from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine stroke movement interventions subcommittee. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Ben Heller,et al.  The Design, Development and Evaluation of an Array-Based FES System with Automated Setup for the Correction of Drop Foot , 2015 .

[13]  J. Norton,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  Miguel Hernandez Silveira Development and evaluation of a surface array based system to assist electrode positioning in FES for drop foot , 2009 .

[15]  David Howard,et al.  Feasibility study of a take-home array-based functional electrical stimulation system with automated setup for current functional electrical stimulation users with foot-drop. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Morari,et al.  The Influence of Electrode Size on Selectivity and Comfort in Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Forearm , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  P.L. Melo,et al.  Technical developments of functional electrical stimulation to correct drop foot: sensing, actuation and control strategies. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Ben W Heller,et al.  Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  Ben Heller,et al.  Improved control of ankle movement using an array of mini-electrodes. , 2003 .

[20]  D. Howard,et al.  The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Phase II trial to evaluate the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator in established hemiplegia. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  Thomas Seel,et al.  Multivariable Control of Foot Motion During Gait by Peroneal Nerve Stimulation via two Skin Electrodes , 2015 .

[23]  F. Rattay Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.