Characterizing Post-Glossectomy Speech Using Real-time MRI

We use real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) as a tool to investigate post-glossectomy speech by examining articulatory behavior. Our data reveal that listeners perceive speech produced by postoperative partial-glossectomy patients whose surgical procedure most affected the base of tongue to be typical, while speech produced by patients whose procedure affected the oral tongue is perceived to be atypical. Mechanisms of both preservation and compensation are exhibited by post-glossectomy patients whose speech is deemed atypical by listeners. These patients employ the preservative behavior of maintaining durational differences in tense and lax vowels, as well as range of F1 (vowel height). Range of F2 (vowel backness), however, is severely reduced. Compensatory behavior is exhibited when coronal tongue movement has been impeded and is exemplified by (i) production of labial stops in place of target coronal stops and laterals and (ii) frication being produced by formation of a constriction between the tongue dorsum and palate, in place of alveolar fricative /s/.

[1]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  Synchronized and noise-robust audio recordings during realtime magnetic resonance imaging scans. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Clark,et al.  Chemotherapy for head and neck cancer: progress and controversy in the management of patients with M0 disease. , 1989, Seminars in oncology.

[3]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Data-driven analysis of realtime vocal tract MRI using correlated image regions , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[4]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[5]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Improvement of speech intelligibility by a secondary operation to mobilize the tongue after glossectomy. , 1989, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  An approach to real-time magnetic resonance imaging for speech production. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Speech intelligibility after resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth , 1988 .

[8]  Athanasios Katsamanis,et al.  Direct Estimation of Articulatory Kinematics from Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Image Sequences , 2011, INTERSPEECH.

[9]  M H Cohen,et al.  Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[11]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Speech production following partial glossectomy. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Speech and swallow function after tonsil/base of tongue resection with primary closure. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  H B Fisher,et al.  Compensatory articulation patterns of a surgically treated oral cancer patient. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[15]  K. Michi,et al.  Articulatory function after resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth: palatometric and perceptual evaluation. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  X‐ray microbeam speech production database , 1990 .