Responsibility Diffusion in Cooperative Collectives

The authors examined questions about diffusion of responsibility in groups by asking group members to apportion responsibility for an outcome to each group member: Does responsibility diffuse more as groups increase in size but eventually level off in larger groups? Does responsibility diffuse equally, with each member getting an equal portion, or is it concentrated on certain individuals? Do group members apportion responsibility in ways that maximize their own self-esteem? Dyads attributed more responsibility to others after failure than success, but four-person groups tended to take the blame for failure. Overall, however, responsibility diffused in proportion to group size as group members concentrated more responsibility on some group members and withheld responsibility from others through specific role allocations. There was a significant degree of consensus in group members’ perceptions of individual members’ contributions to performance, but members generally felt they contributed more to the group than did other members.

[1]  A. Murrell,et al.  Effects of social identity and threat on self-esteem and group attributions. , 1998 .

[2]  J. Nezlek,et al.  Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Analyze Grouped Data , 2004 .

[3]  A. Zander,et al.  Motives and goals in groups , 1971 .

[4]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  The impact of inhibiting or facilitating causal factors on group members' reactions after success and failure , 1984 .

[5]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. , 1984 .

[6]  Jennifer G. Boldry,et al.  Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. , 1999 .

[7]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  The Effects of Self-Serving vs. Other-Serving Claims of Responsibility on Attraction and Attribution in Groups , 1981 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[9]  M. E. Shaw,et al.  Effects of Attribution of Responsibility for a Negative Event to a Group Member Upon Group Process as a Function of the Structure of the Event , 1971 .

[10]  B. Weiner.  "Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Responsibility, norms, and helping in an emergency. , 1970 .

[12]  Sanford B. Ehrlich,et al.  The Romance of Leadership and The Evaluation of Organizational Performance , 1987 .

[13]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[15]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failure , 1973 .

[16]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[17]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[18]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Egocentrism in groups: Self-serving biases or logical information processing? , 1977 .

[19]  A. Bandura.  Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  D. K. Marcus.  Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. , 1998 .

[21]  D. Kashy,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups , 2012 .

[22]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[23]  Mark Schaller,et al.  Methods for the Measurement of Consensual Beliefs Within Groups , 1998 .

[24]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Self-serving bias and actor–observer differences in organizations: An empirical analysis. , 1985 .

[25]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[27]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[28]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[29]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .

[30]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955 .

[31]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[32]  Bruce T. Caine,et al.  Role Position and Group Performance as Determinants of Egotistical Perceptions in Cooperative Groups , 1979 .

[33]  Deborah A. Kashy,et al.  The Social Relations Model: A Tool for Group Psychotherapy Research. , 1995 .

[34]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Attributing the causes of group performance: effects of performance quality, task improtance, and future testing. , 1977, Journal of personality.

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  M. Leary,et al.  Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. , 1987 .

[38]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. , 1981 .

[39]  J. Fleishman,et al.  Collective action as helping behavior: Effects of responsibility diffusion on contributions to a public good. , 1980 .

[40]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Responsibility attribution in groups and individuals : A direct test of the diffusion of responsibility hypothesis , 1975 .