Simulating pedagogical agents in a virtual learning environment

CoPAS (Collaboration Patterns Agent Simulation) is a simulation study carried out with the Wizard of Oz method. Students used a groupware system to solve a learning task in the domain of object-oriented analysis and design using UML (Unified Modelling Language) without meeting each other face-to-face. Simulated software agents (human experts) gave advice for various knowledge-intensive tasks, including tool use, domain (UML) understanding and peer-to-peer collaboration. Our findings indicate that agents can have an effect on collaboration by making users aware of collaboration patterns (division of labour, explicit roles, etc.) and by creating focus shifts in the users' interaction.

[1]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Knowledge-based help systems , 1985, CHI '85.

[2]  Mikael Ericsson,et al.  Supporting the use of design knowledge : an assessment of commenting agents , 1999 .

[3]  John Deacon,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design , 2004 .

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Support for workspace awareness in educational groupware , 1995, CSCL.

[5]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying Activity Theory to Video Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Groupware for developing critical discussion skills , 1995, CSCL.

[7]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[8]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Creativity and Cognition , 2001 .

[9]  Jörg P. Müller,et al.  Architectures and applications of intelligent agents: A survey , 1999, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[10]  James Martin,et al.  Object-oriented analysis and design , 1992 .

[11]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity , 1994, Knowl. Based Syst..

[12]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz , 1993, INTERCHI.

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[14]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[15]  Anders I. Mørch,et al.  Identifying collaboration patterns in collaborative telelearning scenarios , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.

[17]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational interface agents , 2000, CACM.

[18]  Anders I. Mørch,et al.  DoCTA: Design and Use of Collaborative Telelearning Artefacts , 1999 .

[19]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  CRACK: A CRITIQUING APPROACH TO COOPERATIVE KITCHEN DESIGN , 1988 .

[20]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Paradigm shifts and instructional technology : An introduction , 1996 .

[21]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[22]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  What does the design of effective CSCL require and how do we study its effects? , 1992, SCOU.