To Clone or Not to Clone? Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Can Be Generated in Bulk Culture

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are usually clonally derived. The selection of fully reprogrammed cells generally involves picking of individual colonies with morphology similar to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Given that fully reprogrammed cells are highly proliferative and escape from cellular senescence, it is conceivable that they outgrow non-pluripotent and partially reprogrammed cells during culture expansion without the need of clonal selection. In this study, we have reprogrammed human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) with episomal plasmid vectors. Colony frequency was higher and size was larger when using murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as stromal support instead of HDFs or human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). We have then compared iPSCs which were either clonally derived by manual selection of a single colony, or derived from bulk-cultures of all initial colonies. After few passages their morphology, expression of pluripotency markers, and gene expression profiles did not reveal any significant differences. Furthermore, clonally-derived and bulk-cultured iPSCs revealed similar in vitro differentiation potential towards the three germ layers. Therefore, manual selection of individual colonies does not appear to be necessary for the generation of iPSCs – this is of relevance for standardization and automation of cell culture procedures.

[1]  J. Thomson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. , 1998, Science.

[2]  Jianming Xu.  Preparation, culture, and immortalization of mouse embryonic fibroblasts. , 2005, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[3]  Yutao Du,et al.  Low incidence of DNA sequence variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by nonintegrating plasmid expression. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[4]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .

[5]  A I Saeed,et al.  TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[6]  K. Plath,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines , 2011, Cell.

[8]  Marius Wernig,et al.  Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  M. Lagarkova,et al.  Generation and Characterization of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2009, Acta naturae.

[10]  W. Wagner.  Implications of long-term culture for mesenchymal stem cells: genetic defects or epigenetic regulation? , 2012, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[11]  Oliver Brüstle,et al.  Automated selection and collection of pluripotent stem cell colonies using the CellCelector|[trade]| , 2009 .

[12]  J. Hescheler,et al.  Initial Colony Morphology-Based Selection for iPS Cells Derived from Adult Fibroblasts Is Substantially Improved by Temporary UTF1-Based Selection , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2007, Nature.

[14]  M. Zenke,et al.  Donor Age of Human Platelet Lysate Affects Proliferation and Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  J. Mertens,et al.  Excitation-induced ataxin-3 aggregation in neurons from patients with Machado–Joseph disease , 2011, Nature.

[16]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[17]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[18]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of pluripotency by defined factors , 2011, Neuroscience Research.

[19]  S. Cole,et al.  Sequences Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Vector and Transgene , 2012 .

[20]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[21]  S. Yamanaka.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: past, present, and future. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[22]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  The tumorigenicity of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Hsiang-Po Huang,et al.  Surface Marker Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule and E-cadherin Facilitate the Identification and Selection of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2011, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[24]  Hidenori Akutsu,et al.  DNA Methylation Dynamics in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells over Time , 2011, Human Cell.

[25]  G. Daley,et al.  Human embryonic stem cells , 2004, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[26]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Background mutations in parental cells account for most of the genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[27]  C. Suschek,et al.  Specific Age-Associated DNA Methylation Changes in Human Dermal Fibroblasts , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  A. Ho,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell Preparations—Comparing Apples and Oranges , 2007, Stem Cell Reviews.

[29]  P. Dröge,et al.  A UTF1-based selection system for stable homogeneously pluripotent human embryonic stem cell cultures , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Bernhard M. Schuldt,et al.  A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells , 2011, Nature Methods.

[31]  R. Stewart,et al.  Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Vector and Transgene Sequences , 2009, Science.

[32]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[33]  Chris Mason,et al.  The impact of manual processing on the expansion and directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  H. Hennies,et al.  Induced pluripotent mesenchymal stromal cell clones retain donor-derived differences in DNA methylation profiles. , 2013, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[35]  G. Daley,et al.  Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Andrew P. Feinberg,et al.  Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells causes DNA-methylation changes which correlate with repressive histone marks , 2011, Aging.

[39]  Stéphanie Boué,et al.  Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Xianmin Zeng.  Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Mechanisms to Escape Replicative Senescence? , 2007, Stem Cell Reviews.

[42]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells escape from senescence-associated DNA methylation changes , 2013, Genome research.

[43]  Michael Forgber,et al.  Automated selection and harvesting of pluripotent stem cell colonies , 2012, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[44]  L. Hayflick,et al.  The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. , 1961, Experimental cell research.

[45]  Hélène Rouard,et al.  Clinical-grade production of human mesenchymal stromal cells: occurrence of aneuploidy without transformation. , 2010, Blood.

[46]  Jarrett Rosenberg,et al.  Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[47]  E. Kirkness,et al.  Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[48]  Linzhao Cheng,et al.  Human Adult Marrow Cells Support Prolonged Expansion of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Culture , 2003, Stem cells.

[49]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[50]  Julie V. Harness,et al.  Recurrent variations in DNA methylation in human pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated derivatives. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[51]  Perminder S Sachdev,et al.  Human induced pluripotent stem cells derived under feeder-free conditions display unique cell cycle and DNA replication gene profiles. , 2012, Stem cells and development.

[52]  D. Spitkovsky,et al.  “The Good into the Pot, the Bad into the Crop!”—A New Technology to Free Stem Cells from Feeder Cells , 2008, PloS one.

[53]  Masafumi Okumura,et al.  Heterogeneity of pluripotent marker gene expression in colonies generated in human iPS cell induction culture. , 2008, Stem cell research.

[54]  S. Lehmann,et al.  Rejuvenating senescent and centenarian human cells by reprogramming through the pluripotent state. , 2011, Genes & development.

[55]  Yasuko Matsumura,et al.  A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.