Calibration of PCB-132 Sensors in a Shock Tube

While PCB-132 sensors have proven useful for measuring second-mode instability waves in many hypersonic wind tunnels, they are currently limited by their calibration. Until now, the factory calibration has been all that was available, which is a single-point calibration at an amplitude three orders of magnitude higher than a second-mode wave. In addition, little information has been available about the frequency response or spatial resolution of the sensors, which is important for measuring high-frequency instability waves. These shortcomings make it difficult to compare measurements at different conditions and between different sensors. If accurate quantitative measurements could be performed, comparisons of the growth and breakdown of instability waves could be made in different facilities, possibly leading to a method of predicting the amplitude at which the waves break down into turbulence, improving transition prediction. A method for calibrating the sensors is proposed using a newly-built shock tube at Purdue University. This shock tube, essentially a half-scale version of the 6-Inch shock tube at the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories at Caltech, has been designed to attain a moderate vacuum in the driven section. Low driven pressures should allow the creation of very weak, yet still relatively thin shock waves. It is expected that static pressure rises within the range of second-mode amplitudes should be possible. The shock tube has been designed to create clean, planar shock waves with a laminar boundary layer to allow for accurate calibrations. Stronger shock waves can be used to identify the frequency response of the sensors out to hundreds of kilohertz.

[1]  P. A. Thompson,et al.  Compressible Fluid Dynamics , 1972 .

[2]  R. Kimmel,et al.  On hypersonic boundary-layer stability , 1992 .

[3]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  Boundary-Layer Stability Calculations for the HIFiRE-1 Transition Experiment , 2008 .

[4]  J. Kendall Wind Tunnel Experiments Relating to Supersonic and Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition , 1974 .

[5]  S. Pate,et al.  Measurements and Correlations of Transition Reynolds Numbers on Sharp Slender Cones at High Speeds , 1971 .

[6]  R. Radespiel,et al.  Surface-Pressure Measurements of Second-Mode Instability in Quiet Hypersonic Flow , 2008 .

[7]  Sb Ras Stabilization of high-speed boundary layer using porous coatings of various thicknesses , 2010 .

[8]  Shann J. Rufer,et al.  Measurements and computations of second-mode instability waves in three hypersonic wind tunnels. , 2010 .

[9]  L. Mack Linear Stability Theory and the Problem of Supersonic Boundary- Layer Transition , 1975 .

[10]  Alexander N. Shiplyuk,et al.  Stabilization of High-Speed Boundary Layer Using Porous Coatings of Various Thicknesses , 2012 .

[11]  Katya M. Casper,et al.  Hypersonic Wind-Tunnel Measurements of Boundary Layer Pressure Fluctuations. , 2009 .

[12]  Anthony Demetriades,et al.  An experiment on the stability of hypersonic laminar boundary layers , 1960, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  K. Fujii An Experiment of Two Dimensional Roughness Effect on Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition , 2005 .

[14]  S. Schneider Flight Data for Boundary-Layer Transition at Hypersonic and Supersonic Speeds , 1999 .

[15]  Steven P. Schneider,et al.  Comparison of Experimentally Measured and Computed Second-Mode Disturbances in Hypersonic Boundary-Layers , 2010 .

[16]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Aerothermodynamics and Transition in High-Speed Wind Tunnels at NASA Langley , 1990 .

[17]  Shann J. Rufer,et al.  Experimental Study of Second-Mode Instabilities on a 7-Degree Cone at Mach 6 , 2011 .

[18]  Mario A. Rotea,et al.  Model identification of a kulite pressure transducer , 1996 .

[19]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Boundary-layer transition on a cone and flat plate at Mach 3.5 , 1989 .

[20]  Daniel R. Lewis,et al.  Improved Measurements of "Tunnel Noise" Pressure Fluctuations in the AEDC Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel No. 9 , 2011 .