Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities

Abstract With 54% of the world's population urban in 2014 it is important to assess the sustainability of cities and find systematic ways of improving it. In this paper the model SAFE (sustainability assessment by fuzzy evaluation) that was first developed to define and measure the sustainability of countries, is modified to assess the sustainability of cities worldwide. Overall sustainability is a function of two main inputs, ecological and well-being. The ecological input depends on the state of air, land and water and the well-being input on the state of the economy, education, health and civic environment of cities. SAFE uses 46 basic inputs to rank 106 cities according to sustainability. The number of inputs can be changed according to need. A sensitivity analysis identifies those basic inputs or indicators that affect sustainability the most. If such inputs are improved, the sustainability of cities improves the fastest. It turns out that European cities occupy the highest ranking positions whereas African, Asian, and South American cities the lowest. Waste generation and GHG (greenhouse gases) emissions are the main problems for cities in the developed world, whereas crime and poverty are the main problems in cities of developing countries.

[1]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[2]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  On the monotonicity of hierarchical sum-product fuzzy systems , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Sverker Molander,et al.  A set of indicators for the assessment of temporal variations in the sustainability of sanitary systems , 1999 .

[4]  Mark J. McDonnell,et al.  The ecological future of cities , 2016, Science.

[5]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking , 2006 .

[6]  David Satterthwaite,et al.  How urban societies can adapt to resource shortage and climate change , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment , 1995 .

[8]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Nations and Related Decision Making Using Fuzzy Logic , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[9]  M. Lundin,et al.  A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems , 2002 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Grant,et al.  An aggregating approach to ranking cities for knowledge-based development , 2012 .

[11]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries , 2011 .

[12]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[13]  Y. Phillis,et al.  Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis , 2004 .

[14]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Environmental sustainability benchmarking of the U.S. and Canada metropoles: An expert judgment-based multi-criteria decision making approach , 2015 .

[15]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[16]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[18]  Manouchehr Vaziri,et al.  Sustainable Urban Transport Assessment in Asian Cities , 2013 .