Field of view extension and truncation correction for MR-based human attenuation correction in simultaneous MR/PET imaging.

PURPOSE In quantitative PET imaging, it is critical to accurately measure and compensate for the attenuation of the photons absorbed in the tissue. While in PET/CT the linear attenuation coefficients can be easily determined from a low-dose CT-based transmission scan, in whole-body MR/PET the computation of the linear attenuation coefficients is based on the MR data. However, a constraint of the MR-based attenuation correction (AC) is the MR-inherent field-of-view (FoV) limitation due to static magnetic field (B0) inhomogeneities and gradient nonlinearities. Therefore, the MR-based human AC map may be truncated or geometrically distorted toward the edges of the FoV and, consequently, the PET reconstruction with MR-based AC may be biased. This is especially of impact laterally where the patient arms rest beside the body and are not fully considered. METHODS A method is proposed to extend the MR FoV by determining an optimal readout gradient field which locally compensates B0 inhomogeneities and gradient nonlinearities. This technique was used to reduce truncation in AC maps of 12 patients, and the impact on the PET quantification was analyzed and compared to truncated data without applying the FoV extension and additionally to an established approach of PET-based FoV extension. RESULTS The truncation artifacts in the MR-based AC maps were successfully reduced in all patients, and the mean body volume was thereby increased by 5.4%. In some cases large patient-dependent changes in SUV of up to 30% were observed in individual lesions when compared to the standard truncated attenuation map. CONCLUSIONS The proposed technique successfully extends the MR FoV in MR-based attenuation correction and shows an improvement of PET quantification in whole-body MR/PET hybrid imaging. In comparison to the PET-based completion of the truncated body contour, the proposed method is also applicable to specialized PET tracers with little uptake in the arms and might reduce the computation time by obviating the need for iterative calculations of the PET emission data beyond those required for reconstructing images.

[1]  K. Scheffler,et al.  MR‐based field‐of‐view extension in MR/PET: B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement (HUGE) , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M. Forsting,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: feasibility and initial results. , 2013, Radiology.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Hybrid Imaging: Clinical Experience , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[4]  J Balter,et al.  Patient-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Nuyts,et al.  Completion of a Truncated Attenuation Image From the Attenuated PET Emission Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging: MR-based attenuation correction of local radiofrequency surface coils. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  MR-based FoV Extension in Whole-Body MR/PET Using Continuous Table Move , 2012 .

[9]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Hybrid PET/MRI imaging with continuous table motion. , 2012, Medical physics.

[10]  N. F. Schwenzer,et al.  Whole-body MR/PET: applications in abdominal imaging , 2012, Abdominal Imaging.

[11]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Multislice 2D spin echo imaging using adapted readout gradients for compensation of BO inhomogeneities and gradient nonlinearities , 2011 .

[13]  Qi Peng,et al.  Novel segmentation method for abdominal fat quantification by MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M. Ladd,et al.  Evaluation of hardware-related geometrical distortion in structural MRI at 7 Tesla for image-guided applications in neurosurgery. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[15]  Sibylle Ziegler,et al.  MR/PET Attenuation correction using a multi tissue model for quantification of cardiac uptake: Initial comparison to PET/CT , 2011 .

[16]  H H Quick,et al.  The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data , 2013, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[18]  Matthias Hofmann,et al.  Hybrid PET/MRI of Intracranial Masses: Initial Experiences and Comparison to PET/CT , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  Matthias Hofmann,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging in a Human PET/MR Hybrid System , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[21]  C D Claussen,et al.  Switching on the Lights for Real-Time Multimodality Tumor Neuroimaging: The Integrated Positron-Emission Tomography/MR Imaging System , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[22]  P. Choyke,et al.  Imaging Prostate Cancer: An Update on Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Current urology reports.

[23]  I. Buvat,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Michael O Zenge,et al.  Novel reconstruction method for three‐dimensional axial continuously moving table whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging featuring autocalibrated parallel imaging GRAPPA , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  B Gino Fallone,et al.  Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images. , 2007, Medical physics.

[29]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[31]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[33]  M A Moerland,et al.  Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.