A Finite State Machine Fall Detection Using Quadrilateral Shape Features

A video-based fall detection system was presented; which consists of data acquisition, image processing, feature extraction, feature selection, classification and finite state machine. A two-dimensional human posture image was represented by 12 features extracted from the generalisation of a silhouette shape to a quadrilateral. The corresponding feature vectors for three groups of human pose were statistically analysed by using a non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test to assess the different significance level between them. From the statistical test, non-significant features were discarded. Four selected kernel-based Support Vector Machine: linear, quadratics, cubic and Radial Basis Function classifiers were trained to classify three human posture groups. Among four classifiers, the last one performed the best in terms of performance matric on testing set. The classifier outperformed others with high achievement ofaverage sensitivity, precision and F-score of 99.19%, 99.25% and 99.22%, respectively. Such pose classification model output was further used in a simple finite state machine to trigger the falling event alarms. The fall detection system was tested on different fall video sets and able to detect the presence offalling events in a frame sequence of videos with accuracy of 97.32% and low computional time.

[1]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians , 2012, International journal of endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  Rached Tourki,et al.  Optimized spatio-temporal descriptors for real-time fall detection: comparison of support vector machine and Adaboost-based classification , 2013, J. Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Anton Yudhana,et al.  Segmentation Comparing Eggs Watermarking Image and Original Image , 2017 .

[4]  D. Donoho,et al.  Does median filtering truly preserve edges better than linear filtering , 2006, math/0612422.

[5]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[6]  J. Stevens,et al.  Assessment and management of fall risk in primary care settings. , 2015, The Medical clinics of North America.

[7]  K. Lájer Statistical tests as inappropriate tools for data analysis performed on non-random samples of plant communities , 2007, Folia Geobotanica.

[8]  Fadi Al Machot,et al.  A review on applications of activity recognition systems with regard to performance and evaluation , 2016, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[9]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Support Vector Machines and Kernel Methods: The New Generation of Learning Machines , 2002, AI Mag..

[10]  Kp Suresh An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research , 2011, Journal of human reproductive sciences.

[11]  Rdouan Faizi,et al.  Detecting and Shadows in the HSV Color Space Using Dynamic Thresholds , 2018 .

[12]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Robust view transformation model for gait recognition , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Guy Lapalme,et al.  A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Multi-label feature selection with missing labels , 2018, Pattern Recognit..