Critical analysis of key determinants and barriers to digital innovation adoption among architectural organizations

Abstract The development and use of design technology for architecture in the modern world have led to the emergence of various design methodologies. Current design research has focused on a computationally mediated design process. This method is essentially concerned with finding forms and building performance simulation, i.e., structural, environmental, constructional, and cost performance, by integrating physics and algorithms. From the emergence of this process, design practices have been increasingly aided by and dependent on the technology, which has resulted in a major paradigm shift. Advancement of the new technology has the potential to improve design and productivity dramatically. However, related literature shows that substantial technical and organizational barriers exist. These barriers inhibit the effective adoption of these technologies. The effect of these obstacles on architectural practice varies depending on the size of an architectural organization. To further understand the problem, we conducted an in-depth study on several small, medium, and large architectural organizations. This study involves in-depth evaluation of technological, financial, organizational, governmental, psychological, and process barriers encountered in the adoption of digital innovation. Results reveal relevant attributes and patterns of variables, which can be used to establish a framework for digital innovation adoption. Valuable findings of this study reveal that smaller architectural organizations present more barriers to digital innovation compared with their larger counterparts. This study is important because it contributes to the research on digital innovation in architecture and addresses the barriers faced by different sizes of architectural organizations.

[1]  Eyal Nir From No-Dimensions to N-Dimensions with Parametric Point-Clouds , 2007 .

[2]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Framework for managing business development in the networked organisation , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[3]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Mario Pianta,et al.  The employment impact of innovation: Evidence and policy , 2000 .

[5]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research' , 2010 .

[6]  Martyn Jones,et al.  Managing Innovation in Construction , 2003 .

[7]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[8]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Using L-systems for modeling the architecture and physiology of growing trees: The L-PEACH model , 2004 .

[9]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Path Creation in Digital Innovation: A Multi-Layered Dialectics Perspective , 2009 .

[10]  Christoph M. Hoffmann Constraint-Based Computer-Aided Design , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[11]  Tony Davila,et al.  Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It , 2005 .

[12]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[13]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Designing with Parametric CAD: Classification and comparison of construction techniques , 1998 .

[14]  Branko Kolarevic,et al.  Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing , 2004 .

[15]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[16]  Ali Shabanesfahani,et al.  Barriers of Systemic Innovation to Increase Productivity of Engineering and Construction Industries of the World , 2012 .

[17]  Yusuf Arayici Building information modelling , 2015 .

[18]  Samuel Hollander,et al.  The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants , 1965 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[20]  Robert E. and Laepple Eberhard S. Johnson Digital Innovation and Organizational Change in Design Practice , 2003 .

[21]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[22]  Karen Kensek Building Information Modeling , 2014 .

[23]  Jesper Svensson Living Lab Principles: Supporting Digital Innovation , 2012 .

[24]  Dennis R. Shelden Digital surface representation and the constructibility of Gehry's architecture , 2002 .

[25]  Ricardo Cabral,et al.  Adoption of a Process Innovation with Learning‐by‐Doing: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry , 2003 .

[26]  Marco Vivarelli,et al.  The economics of technology and employment : theory and empirical evidence , 1995 .

[27]  Singh Intrachooto Technological innovation in architecture : effective practices for energy efficient implementation , 2002 .

[28]  Clark A. Cory,et al.  3D Modeling for the Architectural Engineering and Construction Industry , 2001 .

[29]  Michael Hensel Emergence : morphogenetic design strategies , 2004 .

[30]  Roberto Simonetti,et al.  Product and process innovations: How are they defined? How are they quantified? , 2005, Scientometrics.