Point Selection under Emerging Wireless Technologies

Users of wireless networks increasingly face a choice among multiple available access points. Clients generally make this decision with limited information about the access points or traffic trends in the system. We examine the strategic implications of an emerging wireless technology: utilizing multiple access points (APs) simultaneously. Clients using this technology require up-to-date information about the expected delays at available APs, which can be obtained through active probing. We model this scenario as a load balancing game, augmented to incorporate abstractions of these two technologies. Using techniques of empirical game-theoretic analysis, we evaluate a range of plausible strategies through simulation. We find that variants of the Hedge algorithms, previously shown effective at the single unit load balancing game under the bulletin board model, remain promising for scheduling multiple jobs per period; however, when delay information can only be obtained from using or probing an access point, all variants of the Hedge algorithm we examined were outperformed by simple decision-theoretic optimization policies.

[1]  Csaba D. Tóth,et al.  Selfish load balancing and atomic congestion games , 2004, SPAA '04.

[2]  J. Nash NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[3]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case equilibria , 1999 .

[4]  Marco Mellia,et al.  Large-Scale Available Bandwidth Measurements: Shortcomings of Current Techniques , 2009 .

[5]  Mike Y. Chen,et al.  Improved access point selection , 2006, MobiSys '06.

[6]  Subhash Suri,et al.  A game-theoretic analysis of wireless access point selection by mobile users , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[7]  Jie Wu,et al.  Designing a Practical Access Point Association Protocol , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  WiSwitcher: an efficient client for managing multiple APs , 2009, PRESTO '09.

[9]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Strategic analysis with simulation-based games , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[10]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Multihoming of Users to Access Points in WLANs: A Population Game Perspective , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  MultiNet: connecting to multiple IEEE 802.11 networks using a single wireless card , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[12]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  How Useful Is Old Information? , 2000, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[13]  Antonio Capone,et al.  Modelling network selection and resource allocation in wireless access networks with non-cooperative games , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[14]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Methods for empirical game-theoretic analysis (extended abstract) , 2006 .

[15]  Daniel M. Reeves,et al.  Notes on Equilibria in Symmetric Games , 2004 .

[16]  Csaba D. Tóth,et al.  Selfish Load Balancing and Atomic Congestion Games , 2004, SPAA '04.

[17]  D. Friedman EVOLUTIONARY GAMES IN ECONOMICS , 1991 .

[18]  Panagiota N. Panagopoulou,et al.  Selfish Load Balancing Under Partial Knowledge , 2007, MFCS.