Rate of leaf appearance in sugarcane, including a comparison of a range of varieties

Leaf appearance rate is a major determinant of canopy establishment, radiation interception and therefore yield. The effect of genotype on leaf appearance rate in sugarcane is largely unknown. Leaf appearance rate was recorded for the mainstems of pot grown sugarcane plants of nine commercial varieties, over 10 months in Townsville, Australia. Bi-phasic linear, polynomial and power-law models were fitted to data describing leaf appearance with thermal time. The bi-phasic model (previously used for sugarcane) had a single large change in phyllochron for which no biological explanation is apparent. Polynomials were less likely to predict leaf appearance accurately outside the range of fitted data. The power-law model gave a continuously increasing thermal time between the appearance of successive leaves (phyllochron) and was used to compare the varieties. An increasing phyllochron for the first 15 leaves could be explained, in part, by the increasing length of lamina each successive leaf had to grow through. However, an explanation for an increasing phyllochron throughout ontogeny has yet to be found. The rate of leaf appearance was significantly different between the varieties. After 5000˚Cd the number of leaves predicted to have appeared ranged from 35 to 46. These variety specific parameters make an important contribution to describing how different varieties produce leaf area.

[1]  J. N. Gallagher Field Studies of Cereal Leaf Growth I. INITIATION AND EXPANSION IN RELATION TO TEMPERATURE AND ONTOGENY , 1979 .

[2]  W. Cao,et al.  Temperature effect on leaf emergence and phyllochron in wheat and barley , 1989 .

[3]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  The Effect of Temperature on Leaf Appearance in Rice , 1996 .

[4]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Temperature and leaf area expansion of sugarcane: integration of controlled-environment, field and model studies , 1998 .

[5]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize , 1989 .

[6]  C. R. Weber,et al.  Leaf Area, Solar Radiation Interception and Dry Matter Production by Soybeans 1 , 1965 .

[7]  J. F. Reid,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF A MAIZE CANOPY DEVELOPMENT : 1. LEAF ONTOGENY , 1989 .

[8]  G. Slafer,et al.  Phyllochron in Wheat as Affected by Photoperiod Under Two Temperature Regimes , 1997 .

[9]  T. B. Daynard,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN RATES OF LEAF APPEARANCE AMONG MAIZE HYBRIDS AND PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT , 1984 .

[10]  Christopher P. L. Grof,et al.  Temperature effects on node appearance in sugarcane , 1998 .

[11]  R. Delécolle,et al.  The setting of rates of development of wheat plants at crop emergence: Influence of the environment on rates of leaf appearance , 1989 .

[12]  N. Inman-Bamber Temperature and seasonal effects on canopy development and light interception of sugarcane , 1994 .

[13]  N. Inman-Bamber A growth model for sugar-cane based on a simple carbon balance and the CERES· Maize water balance , 1991 .

[14]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  GROWTH OF SUGARCANE UNDER HIGH INPUT CONDITIONS IN TROPICAL AUSTRALIA. I. RADIATION USE, BIOMASS ACCUMULATION AND PARTITIONING , 1996 .