Quantifying components of aerosol‐cloud‐radiation interactions in climate models

The interaction of anthropogenic aerosols with radiation and clouds is the largest source of uncertainty in the radiative forcing of the climate during the industrial period. Here we apply novel techniques to diagnose the contributors to the shortwave (SW) effective radiative forcing (ERF) from aerosol‐radiation‐interaction (ERFari) and from aerosol cloud interaction (ERFaci) in experiments performed in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. We find that the ensemble mean SW ERFari+aci of −1.40±0.56 W m−2 comes roughly 25% from ERFari (−0.35±0.20 W m−2) and 75% from ERFaci (−1.04±0.67 W m−2). ERFari is made up of −0.62±0.30 W m−2 due to aerosol scattering opposed by +0.26 ± 0.12 W m−2 due to aerosol absorption and is largest near emission sources. The ERFari from nonsulfate aerosols is +0.13 ± 0.09 W m−2, consisting of −0.15±0.11 W m−2 of scattering and +0.29 ± 0.15 W m−2 of absorption. The change in clear‐sky flux is a negatively biased measure of ERFari, as the presence of clouds reduces the magnitude and intermodel spread of ERFari by 40–50%. ERFaci, which is large both near and downwind of emission sources, is composed of −0.99±0.54 W m−2 from enhanced cloud scattering, with much smaller contributions from increased cloud amount and absorption. In models that allow aerosols to affect ice clouds, large increases in the optical depth of high clouds cause substantial longwave and shortwave radiative anomalies. Intermodel spread in ERFaci is dominated by differences in how aerosols increase cloud scattering, but even if all models agreed on this effect, over a fifth of the spread in ERFaci would remain due solely to differences in total cloud amount.

[1]  T. Andrews Using an AGCM to Diagnose Historical Effective Radiative Forcing and Mechanisms of Recent Decadal Climate Change , 2014 .

[2]  S. Jeffrey,et al.  Projected effects of declining aerosols in RCP4.5: unmasking global warming? , 2013 .

[3]  S. Ghan Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing , 2013 .

[4]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[5]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations , 2013 .

[6]  K. Taylor,et al.  Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5 , 2012 .

[7]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Estimates of aerosol radiative forcing from the MACC re-analysis , 2012 .

[8]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[9]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[10]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels , 2012 .

[11]  A. Donohoe,et al.  Atmospheric and Surface Contributions to Planetary Albedo , 2011 .

[12]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation? , 2009 .

[13]  K. Taylor,et al.  Estimating shortwave radiative forcing and response in climate models , 2007 .

[14]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  The semi‐direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus , 2004 .

[15]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[16]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  Indirect Aerosol Forcing, Quasi Forcing, and Climate Response , 2001 .

[17]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[18]  J. Kiehl,et al.  The Relative Roles of Sulfate Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases in Climate Forcing , 1993, Science.

[19]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[20]  S. Twomey,et al.  Aerosols, clouds and radiation , 1991 .