Humanizing and feminizing school science: reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education

Science and scientists in general reject any form of animism or anthropomorphism. Meanwhile, there is considerable evidence that these forms of thinking are quite commonly present in the constructions and causal explanations of both children and adults as they try to make sense of their everyday world. The question is: can animistic and anthropomorphic ways of thinking have any positive value in school science? This article addresses four distinctive but linked issues within the broad context of constructivist science education. The first concerns the mismatch between animistic thought and the ‘mechanistic’ world‐view of orthodox science. The second examines the extent to which such ways of thinking are manifest and their relationship to general constructivist theory. The third explores briefly some classroom and textbook examples in use. The fourth explores some implications of this for instruction in science education. Within this, the article is premised on the notion that the mechanistic nature of sci...

[1]  H. Bartov,et al.  Teaching students to understand the advantages and disadvantages of teleological and anthropomorphic statements in biology , 1981 .

[2]  G. Matthews,et al.  Philosophy and the Young Child , 1980 .

[3]  G. J. Goodfield.  An Imagined World: A Story of Scientific Discovery , 1991 .

[4]  B. Bettelheim,et al.  The Uses of Enchantment , 1978 .

[5]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[6]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of the World , 1971 .

[7]  Students' Perceptions and Learning Styles Associated with the Concept of Evolution by Natural Selection , 1979 .

[8]  F. Dyson,et al.  Disturbing The Universe , 1979 .

[9]  Mike Watts,et al.  An Instructional 'Man-Trap': Anthropomorphic and Animistic Thought in Constructivist Science Education. , 1991 .

[10]  J. Piaget.  The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[11]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The Problems Of Biology , 1986 .

[12]  井口 道生.  F. Dyson: Disturbing the Universe, Harper & Row, New York, 1979, 284ページ, 24×16cm, $12,95. , 1980 .

[13]  I. N. Marshall,et al.  The Quantum Self , 1991 .

[14]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[15]  J. Gilbert,et al.  The ‘new learning’: Research, development and the reform of school science education , 1989 .

[16]  J. Barrow,et al.  The Anthropic Cosmological Principle , 1987 .

[17]  How do intermediate and junior high school students conceptualize living and nonliving , 1981 .

[18]  E. Keller.  Gender and Science , 2019, Feminist Research Methods.

[19]  J. Clement,et al.  Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions , 1989 .

[20]  C. Mackinnon.  Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory , 1982, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.