Combining Monte Carlo simulations and experimental design for incorporating risk and uncertainty in investment decisions for cleantech: a fast pyrolysis case study

The value of phytoextracting crops (plants cultivated for soil remediation) depends on the profitability of the sequential investment in a conversion technology aimed at the economic valorization of the plants. However, the net present value (NPV) of an investment in such an innovative technology is risky due to technical and economic uncertainties. Therefore, decision makers want to dispose of information about the probability of a positive NPV, the largest possible loss, and the crucial economic and technical parameters influencing the NPV. This paper maps the total uncertainty in the NPV of an investment in fast pyrolysis for the production of combined heat and power from willow cultivated for phytoextraction in the Belgian Campine. The probability of a positive NPV has been calculated by performing Monte Carlo simulations. Information about possible losses has been provided by means of experimental design. Both methods are then combined in order to identify the key economic and technical parameters influencing the project’s profitability. It appears that the case study has a chance of 87% of generating a positive NPV with an expected value of 3 million euro (MEUR), while worst-case scenarios predict possible losses of 7 MEUR. The amount of arable land, the biomass yield, the purchase price of the crop, the policy support, and the product yield of fast pyrolysis are identified as the most influential parameters. It is concluded that both methods, i.e., Monte Carlo simulations and experimental design, provide decision makers with complementary information with regard to economic risk.

[1]  Guillaume Echevarria,et al.  Current status and challenges in developing nickel phytomining: an agronomic perspective , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[2]  Tero Haahtela,et al.  Regression sensitivity analysis for cash flow simulation based real option valuation , 2010 .

[3]  Savvakis C. Savvides,et al.  Risk Analysis in Investment Appraisal , 1994 .

[4]  W.P.M. van Swaaij,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of high temperature pyrolysis processes for mixed plastic waste. , 1998 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundations of risk analysis : a knowledge and decision-oriented perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  On the assessment of economic risk: factorial design versus Monte Carlo methods , 1997 .

[7]  John Brammer,et al.  Analysis of transport costs for energy crops for use in biomass pyrolysis plant networks , 2009 .

[8]  Daren E. Daugaard,et al.  Techno-Economic Analysis of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis to Transportation Fuels , 2010 .

[9]  A. Çaǧlar,et al.  The prediction of potential energy and matter production from biomass pyrolysis with artificial neural network , 2017 .

[10]  Russell G. Death,et al.  An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data , 2004 .

[11]  Tristan R. Brown,et al.  Techno-economic impacts of shale gas on cellulosic biofuel pathways , 2014 .

[12]  Tom Kuppens,et al.  Economics of Willow Pyrolysis After Phytoextraction , 2008, International journal of phytoremediation.

[13]  T. Voets,et al.  GIS-based assessment of the biomass potential from phytoremediation of contaminated agricultural land in the Campine region in Belgium , 2011 .

[14]  S Greenland,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis, Monte Carlo Risk Analysis, and Bayesian Uncertainty Assessment , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  John Rogers,et al.  Quantification of employment from biomass power plants , 2008 .

[16]  Sonja Schreurs,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis for the valorization of short rotation coppice cultivated for phytoextraction , 2015 .

[17]  D. Lelie,et al.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[18]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Managing uncertainties in a safety-constrained process system for solvent selection and usage: an optimization approach with technical, economic, and risk factors , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[19]  Willem J. H. Van Groenendaal,et al.  Estimating NPV variability for deterministic models , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Michel De Paepe,et al.  Combined heat and power in a liberalised energy market , 2007 .

[21]  D. Vose.  Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .

[22]  Tiantian Xiong,et al.  Kinetic study of phytotoxicity induced by foliar lead uptake for vegetables exposed to fine particles and implications for sustainable urban agriculture. , 2016, Journal of environmental sciences.

[23]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk modeling, assessment, and management , 1998 .

[24]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision-making , 2015 .

[25]  Farid Nasir Ani,et al.  Techno-economics of rice husk pyrolysis, conversion with catalytic treatment to produce liquid fuel , 2000 .

[26]  I. Raskin,et al.  Phytoremediation of toxic metals : using plants to clean up the environment , 2000 .

[27]  P. Longhurst,et al.  Integrating phytoremediation with biomass valorisation and critical element recovery: A UK contaminated land perspective , 2015 .

[28]  R. Plackett,et al.  THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 1946 .

[29]  Martha Davis,et al.  Graduate Theses and Dissertations , 2013 .

[30]  A. J. Toft,et al.  A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion , 2002 .

[31]  A. Çaǧlar,et al.  The pyrolysis process verification of hydrogen rich gas (H–rG) production by artificial neural network (ANN) , 2016 .

[32]  Wenhao Hu,et al.  Techno-economic, uncertainty, and optimization analysis of commodity product production from biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading , 2015 .

[33]  Liang Peng,et al.  Phytoextraction of cadmium-contaminated soil and potential of regenerated tobacco biomass for recovery of cadmium , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Tom Kuppens,et al.  Economics of electricity and heat production by gasification or flash pyrolysis of short rotation coppice in Flanders (Belgium) , 2011 .

[35]  Y. Haimes.  Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management: Haimes/Risk Modeling, Assessment 2e , 2005 .

[36]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[37]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Deterministic versus stochastic sensitivity analysis in investment problems: An environmental case study , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  André Faaij,et al.  Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation , 2008 .

[39]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economic value of the phytoremediation function – Assessed by the example of cadmium remediation by willow (Salix ssp) , 2006 .

[40]  T. Voets,et al.  GIS-BASED location optimization of a biomass conversion plant on contaminated willow in the Campine region (Belgium) , 2013 .

[41]  Anja Oasmaa,et al.  Proposed Specifications for Various Grades of Pyrolysis Oils , 1997 .

[42]  W. Mostert,et al.  A development perspective for biomass-fuelled electricity generation technologies. Economic technology assessment in view of sustainability , 2004 .

[43]  Jan Broeze,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park , 2013 .

[44]  Tom Kuppens,et al.  Economics of Flash Pyrolysis of Short Rotation Willow from Phytoextraction , 2010 .

[45]  John Brammer,et al.  Estimation of the production cost of fast pyrolysis bio-oil , 2012 .

[46]  Michael Höck,et al.  PhytoGerm: Extraction of germanium from biomass-An economic pre-feasibility study , 2016 .

[47]  Terje Aven,et al.  Expressing Economic Risk—Review and Presentation of a Unifying Approach , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem,et al.  Biomass and Bioenergy , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[49]  Puan Yatim,et al.  Overview of the key risks in the pioneering stage of the Malaysian biomass industry , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[50]  T. Thewys,et al.  The Use of Plants for Remediation of Metal-Contaminated Soils , 2004, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[51]  Tristan R. Brown,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing , 2013 .

[52]  Mohamed H. Gadallah.  An alternative to Monte Carlo simulation method , 2011 .

[53]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Fast pyrolysis of biomass : a handbook , 1999 .

[54]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing , 2011 .

[55]  Jan Baeyens,et al.  Modeling CFB biomass pyrolysis reactors , 2008 .

[56]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass from phytoremediation: Influence of temperature, entrained flow and wood/leaves blended pyrolysis on the behaviour of heavy metals , 2010 .

[57]  Luís A. B. Novo,et al.  Plants to harvest rhenium: scientific and economic viability , 2015, Environmental Chemistry Letters.

[58]  S. Khalid,et al.  A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils , 2017 .

[59]  A. Bridgwater.  Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading , 2012 .

[60]  Zulfan Adi Putra,et al.  Techno‐economic assessment of biomass pre‐conversion processes as a part of biomass‐to‐liquids line‐up , 2009 .

[61]  Colin B. Sorenson,et al.  A COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF FAST PYROLYSIS PLANTS IN , 2010 .

[62]  T. Kuppens,et al.  Economic assessment of flash co-pyrolysis of short rotation coppice and biopolymer waste streams. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[63]  A. Tjoa,et al.  Ultramafic nickel laterites in Indonesia (Sulawesi, Halmahera): mining, nickel hyperaccumulators and opportunities for phytomining , 2013 .