Blood conservation strategies in cardiac surgery: more is better.

OBJECTIVES Recent data show that up to 50% of heart procedures require blood transfusion, which can have adverse long- and short-term outcomes for the patient. This led to the updated 2011 Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS)/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) guidelines in an attempt to adopt more effective blood conservation techniques. We present our results after the implementation of a more aggressive strategy for intraoperative blood conservation in cardiac surgery. METHODS Our cardiac surgery database was reviewed retrospectively, comparing outcomes from two different time periods, after the implementation of a more effective two-way blood conservation strategy beginning in March 2012: more aggressive intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) based on a newly constructed nomogram, and the use of a shorter length circuit of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) which allowed for lower fluid volume as a prime. The method of retrograde autologous priming (RAP) was the same for both time periods. RESULTS A total of 1126 patients (Group 1) were studied in a 12-month period (March 2012-February 2013) after the implementation of the new strategy, and compared with 3758 patients (Group 2) of the previous 36-month period (March 2009-February 2012). There was a significant reduction in the percent change of the intraoperative haematocrit between Groups 1 and 2 (14 vs 28%, P = 0.01), with an increase in the mean IAD volume (655 vs 390 ml, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the CPB priming volume (1000 vs 1600 ml, P = 0.03). Group 1 required significantly less blood transfusions in the perioperative period (29 vs 49%, P = 0.02) and had significantly reduced postoperative rates of respiratory failure (3 vs 7%, P = 0.03), pneumonia (1 vs 3.1%, P = 0.01), chest tube output (350 vs 730 ml, P = 0.01), reoperation for bleeding (1.2 vs 2.5%, P = 0.04) and length of stay (6.1 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Blood conservation is safe and effective in reducing transfusions in cardiac surgery, minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aggressive IAD and low CPB prime, along with effective RAP, is the three-way blood conservation strategy that leads to improved outcomes in cardiac surgery.

[1]  B. Spiess,et al.  Blood product conservation is associated with improved outcomes and reduced costs after cardiac surgery. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J. Slater,et al.  Implementation of a comprehensive blood conservation program can reduce blood use in a community cardiac surgery program. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  Howard K. Song,et al.  2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Howard K. Song,et al.  Update to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Blood Conservation Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2011 .

[5]  E. Hessel,et al.  Guidelines for Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: Lessons and Challenges , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  C. Bodian,et al.  The impact of blood conservation on outcomes in cardiac surgery: is it safe and effective? , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  B. Whitson,et al.  Bloodless Cardiac Surgery is Associated With Decreased Morbidity and Mortality , 2007, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  R. Groom,et al.  Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Increases the Risk of Postoperative Low-Output Heart Failure , 2006, Circulation.

[9]  A. DeAnda,et al.  Developing a Blood Conservation Program in Cardiac Surgery , 2006, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[10]  T. Mihaljevic,et al.  Transfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with reduced long-term survival. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  B. Lytle,et al.  Transfusion increases the risk of postoperative infection after cardiovascular surgery. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  M. Borger,et al.  Low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  R. Habib,et al.  Effect of blood transfusion on long-term survival after cardiac operation. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  R. Groom,et al.  Lowest hematocrit on bypass and adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  S. Body,et al.  Variability in Transfusion Practice for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Persists Despite National Consensus Guidelines: A 24‐Institution Study , 1998 .

[16]  S. Body,et al.  Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: a 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[17]  J. Berlin,et al.  Effect of anaemia and cardiovascular disease on surgical mortality and morbidity , 1996, The Lancet.