Open Data Capability Architecture - An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Despite of increasing availability of open data as a vital organizational resource, large numbers of startups and organizations fail when it comes to utilizing open data effectively. This shortcoming is attributable to the poor understanding of what types of capabilities are required to successfully conduct data related activities. At the same time, research on open data capabilities and how they relate to one another remains sparse. Guided by extant literature, interviews of these organizations, and drawn from Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach which are pair comparison methods to evolve hierarchical relationships among a set of elements to convert unclear and unstructured mental models of systems into well-articulated models that act as base for conceptualization and theory building, this study explores open data capabilities and the relationships and the structure of the dependencies among these areas. Findings from this study reveal hitherto unknown knowledge regarding how the capability areas relate one another in these organizations. From the practical standpoint, the resulting architecture has the potential to transform capability management practices in open data organizations towards greater competitiveness through more flexibility and increased value generation. From the research point of you, this paper motivates theory development in this discipline.

[1]  Jochen Wulf,et al.  Towards a Capability Model for Big Data Analytics , 2017, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[2]  Wendell G. Gilland,et al.  Achieving competitive capabilities in e-services , 2002 .

[3]  M. Janssen,et al.  Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users , 2014 .

[4]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Competitive Capability Framework for Open Government Data Organizations , 2017, DG.O.

[5]  Tilak Raj,et al.  Modeling and analysis of FMS flexibility factors by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[6]  C. Boyce,et al.  Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. , 2006 .

[7]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Qualitative Structural Model for Capabilities in Open Data Organizations , 2019, HICSS.

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Value in business markets : what do we know? where are we going? , 2005 .

[10]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension , 2016 .

[11]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data for competitive advantage: insights from open data use by companies , 2015, DG.O.

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[13]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Capability Development in Open Data-Driven Organizations , 2017 .

[14]  Vasdev Malhotra,et al.  A framework to enhance agile manufacturing system , 2017 .

[15]  James M. Gathungu,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities, Talent Development and Firm Performance , 2012 .

[16]  Hamed Hilal AlYahmady,et al.  Using Nvivo for Data Analysis in Qualitative Research , 2013 .

[17]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[18]  Mie Augier,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  D. K. Banwet,et al.  Modelling critical elements of selection for strategic alliance partner for network managed services using interpretive structural modelling (ISM) , 2013 .

[21]  Adegboyega K. Ojo,et al.  Critical Factors for Dynamic Capabilities in Open Government Data Enabled Organizations , 2016, DG.O.

[22]  Yuan Li,et al.  Analyzing Students' Technology Use Motivations: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[24]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base , 2009 .

[26]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Open data value capability architecture , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[27]  Sushil Modified ISM/TISM Process with Simultaneous Transitivity Checks for Reducing Direct Pair Comparisons , 2017, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[28]  G. Knight,et al.  Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective , 2007 .