Adaptive isolation system combining low-friction sliding pendulum bearings and SMA-based gap dampers

Abstract The flag-shaped hysteretic behavior of Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) can be conveniently used for developing efficient isolation systems, providing energy dissipation without implying residual displacements. This work presents a base isolation layout that combines low-friction curved surface sliders (CSSs) with SMA gap dampers (SMAGDs). The proposed SMAGDs are formed by a group of SMA wires placed in parallel with the CSS isolation system and connected to it through a sliding pin and a slotted ring in order to accomplish the “gap damper” feature. Based on this installation configuration, SMAGDs introduce additional stiffening and energy dissipation to the isolation system only when the displacement of the CSS exceeds a certain threshold or gap displacement d gap , while not being engaged for lower displacements. Consequently, the system exhibits a phased behavior, meaning that its reaction force depends on the amplitude of the displacement. This is particularly convenient for limiting seismic displacements while avoiding at the same time undesirable effects such as high structural accelerations and poor re-centering capability exhibited by alternative systems at low-intensity excitations, e.g. systems based on high-friction CSSs or combinations of CSSs with traditional supplemental energy dissipation devices. The paper describes a preliminary design procedure and the evaluation of the seismic performance of the proposed CSS + SMGAGD system. A leading design parameter of the SMAGDs is the overall cross-sectional area of the SMA wires, which is designed here through a direct displacement based procedure, by introducing some reasonable assumptions for the definition of the linear equivalent mechanical properties of CSS, SMAGD and combined CSS + SMAGD system. This performance-oriented design procedure is aimed at achieving a target displacement demand of the combined CSS + SMAGD system under the maximum credible design earthquake. A parametric study comprising a variety of CSS and SMAGD properties reveals that the proposed isolation layout is suitable to limit the maximum displacement under ultimate limit state earthquakes, providing at the same time satisfactory energy dissipation along with high re-centering capability, and outperforms both low-friction CSSs and high-friction CSSs.

[1]  Andreas Taras,et al.  Seismic Retrofit of Hospitals by Means of Hysteretic Braces: Influence on Acceleration-Sensitive Non-structural Components , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[2]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Restoring capability of friction pendulum seismic isolation systems , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  Lyan-Ywan Lu,et al.  Theory and experimental study for sliding isolators with variable curvature , 2011 .

[4]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[5]  Giovanni Falsone,et al.  Improved response-spectrum analysis of base-isolated buildings: A substructure-based response spectrum method , 2018 .

[6]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic Response of Structures with Variable Friction Pendulum System , 2009 .

[7]  Samuele Infanti,et al.  Frictional Heating in Double Curved Surface Sliders and Its Effects on the Hysteretic Behavior: An Experimental Study , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[8]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Justin D. Marshall,et al.  Development and experimental evaluation of a passive gap damper device to prevent pounding in base‐isolated structures , 2015 .

[10]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Analytical and finite element investigation on the thermo-mechanical coupled response of friction isolators under bidirectional excitation , 2018 .

[11]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation II: Modeling , 1990 .

[12]  Basil Kolias,et al.  Restoring capability of bilinear hysteretic seismic isolation systems , 2008 .

[13]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Soil-dependent optimum design of a new passive vibration control system combining seismic base isolation with tuned inerter damper , 2018 .

[14]  Justin D. Marshall,et al.  Feasibility study of a gap damper to control seismic isolator displacements in extreme earthquakes , 2013 .

[15]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Experimental Study of Sliding Hydromagnetic Isolators for Seismic Protection , 2019, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[16]  Paolo Dubini,et al.  Numerical Assessment of Frictional Heating in Sliding Bearings for Seismic Isolation , 2014 .

[17]  Paolo Dubini,et al.  Experimental investigation of the re‐centring capability of curved surface sliders , 2017 .

[18]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[19]  Paolo Castaldo,et al.  Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings , 2015 .

[20]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Performance evaluation of base‐isolated structures with sliding hydromagnetic bearings , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Ivo Caliò,et al.  Seismic response of multi-storey buildings base-isolated by friction devices with restoring properties , 2003 .

[22]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Characterizing friction in sliding isolation bearings , 2015 .

[23]  Giuseppe Ricciardi,et al.  Earthquake-resilient design of base isolated buildings with TMD at basement: Application to a case study , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  K. Spiliopoulos,et al.  An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings , 1992 .

[25]  Maria Giuseppina Limongelli,et al.  “Total displacement of curved surface sliders under nonseismic and seismic actions: A parametric study” , 2017 .

[26]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Feasibility Assessment of an Innovative Isolation Bearing System with Shape Memory Alloys , 2009 .

[27]  Felice Carlo Ponzo,et al.  Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems , 2017 .

[28]  Fabio Mazza,et al.  Displacement-based design procedure of damped braces for the seismic retrofitting of r.c. framed buildings , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[29]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Response of Base-Isolated USC Hospital Building in Northridge Earthquake , 2000 .

[30]  Justin D. Marshall,et al.  Evaluation of a passive gap damper to control displacements in a shaking test of a seismically isolated three‐story frame , 2017 .

[31]  E. Miglio,et al.  A novel OpenSees element for single curved surface sliding isolators , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[32]  S. Hurlebaus,et al.  Seismic Response Control Using Shape Memory Alloys: A Review , 2011 .

[33]  Constantin Christopoulos,et al.  Seismic Response of Multistory Buildings with Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Steel Braces , 2008 .

[34]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Effect of tuned mass damper on displacement demand of base-isolated structures , 2008 .

[35]  Dario De Domenico,et al.  Effective base isolation combining low-friction curved surface sliders and hysteretic gap dampers , 2020 .

[36]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Equivalent Damping in Support of Direct Displacement-Based Design , 2004 .

[37]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .

[38]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[39]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Sliding implant‐magnetic bearing for adaptive seismic mitigation of base‐isolated structures , 2019, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[40]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Bracing System for the Seismic Resistance of Structures: Development and Validation , 2008 .

[41]  Noemi Bonessio,et al.  Friction Model for Sliding Bearings under Seismic Excitation , 2013 .

[42]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Innovative base-isolated building with large mass-ratio TMD at basement for greater earthquake resilience , 2015 .

[43]  E. Sacco,et al.  A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite , 1997 .

[44]  James M. Kelly,et al.  The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .

[45]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures , 2006 .

[46]  Carlo Poggi,et al.  Experimental assessment of sliding materials for seismic isolation systems , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[47]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[48]  Alberto Pavese,et al.  Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of double curved surface sliders subjected to radial and bidirectional sliding motions , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[49]  Virginio Quaglini,et al.  Effect of the Static Coefficient of Friction of Curved Surface Sliders on the Response of an Isolated Building , 2020 .

[50]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT DESIGN AND RETROFIT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEIR POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS , 2004 .

[51]  S C Liu,et al.  Aseismic Hybrid Control Systems for Building Structures , 1991 .