Process analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles

Process analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas using Ca-based carbonation/calcination cycles is presented here. A carbonation/calcination system is composed essentially of two reactors (an absorber and a regenerator) with Ca-based sorbent circulating between the two reactors (assumed here as fluidized beds). CO2 is, therefore, transferred from the absorber to the regenerator. Because of the endothermicity of the calcination reaction, a certain amount of coal is burned with pure oxygen in the regenerator. Detailed mass balance, heat balance and cost of electricity and CO2 mitigation for the carbonation/calcination cycles with three Ca-based sorbents in dual fluidized beds were calculated and analyzed to study the effect of the Ca-based sorbent activity decay on CO2 capture from flue gas. The three sorbents considered were: limestone, dolomite and CaO/Ca12Al14O33 (75/25 wt %) sorbent. All results, including the amount of coal and oxygen required, are presented with respect to the difference in calcium oxide conversion between the absorber and the regenerator, which is an important design parameter. Finally, costs of electricity and CO2 mitigation costs using carbonation/calcination cycles for the three sorbents were estimated. The results indicate that the economics of the carbonation/calcination process compare favorably with competing technologies for capturing CO2. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2008

[1]  E. Rubin,et al.  Sorbent Cost and Performance in CO2 Capture Systems , 2004 .

[2]  G. P. Curran,et al.  Carbon dioxide-acceptor (coal) gasification process. Studies of acceptor properties. [Process discussed in light of required properties of CaO acceptor; limestones and dolomites are equally useful in process] , 1967 .

[3]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  A fluidized-bed combustion process with inherent CO2 separation; Application of chemical-looping combustion , 2001 .

[4]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  L. W. Hefferman Persistent Occipito-posterior Cases , 1933 .

[6]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion , 2003 .

[7]  Yoshizo Suzuki,et al.  Developing an innovative method, HyPr-RING, to produce hydrogen from hydrocarbons , 2002 .

[8]  Edward J. Anthony,et al.  On the Decay Behavior of the CO2 Absorption Capacity of CaO-Based Sorbents , 2005 .

[9]  Robin W. Hughes,et al.  Attrition of Calcining Limestones in Circulating Fluidized-Bed Systems , 2007 .

[10]  A. M. Squires Cyclic Use of Calcined Dolomite to Desulfurize Fuels Undergoing Gasification , 1967 .

[11]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor , 2007 .

[12]  Jerald A. Cole,et al.  Unmixed combustion: an alternative to fire , 2000 .

[13]  P. Freund,et al.  Making deep reductions in CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plant using capture and storage of CO2 , 2003 .

[14]  John R. Grace,et al.  Removal of CO{sub 2} by calcium-based sorbents in the presence of SO{sub 2} , 2007 .

[15]  Ningsheng Cai,et al.  Synthesis, experimental studies, and analysis of a new calcium-based carbon dioxide absorbent , 2005 .

[16]  János M. Beér,et al.  High efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role , 2007 .

[17]  A. L. Ortíz,et al.  Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process , 1999 .

[18]  Yu-yu Huang,et al.  Effect of Preparation Temperature on Cyclic CO2 Capture and Multiple Carbonation−Calcination Cycles for a New Ca-Based CO2 Sorbent , 2006 .

[19]  I. Barin Thermochemical data of pure substances , 1989 .

[20]  T. Shimizu,et al.  A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes , 1999 .

[21]  John R. Grace,et al.  Removal of CO2 by Calcium-Based Sorbents in the Presence of SO2 , 2007 .

[22]  L. Fan,et al.  Carbonation−Calcination Cycle Using High Reactivity Calcium Oxide for Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gas , 2002 .

[23]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Process evaluation of an 865 MWe lignite fired O2/CO2 power plant , 2006 .

[24]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Conversion Limits in the Reaction of CO2 with Lime , 2003 .

[25]  J. C. Abanades The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3 , 2002 .

[26]  J. Carlos Abanades,et al.  CO2 Capture Capacity of CaO in Long Series of Carbonation/Calcination Cycles , 2006 .

[27]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Fluidized bed combustion systems integrating CO2 capture with CaO. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Robin W. Hughes,et al.  Design, Process Simulation, and Construction of an Atmospheric Dual Fluidized Bed Combustion System for In Situ CO2 Capture Using High-temperature Sorbents , 2005 .

[29]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity , 2006 .