Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI?

Recent advances in diffusion MRI tractography permit the generation of dense weighted structural connectomes that offer greater insight into brain organization. However, these efforts are hampered by the lack of consensus on how to extract topological measures from the resulting graphs. Here we evaluate the common practice of removing the graphs' weak connections, which is primarily intended to eliminate spurious connections and emphasize strong connections. Because this processing step requires arbitrary or heuristic-based choices (e.g., setting a threshold level below which connections are removed), and such choices might complicate statistical analysis and inter-study comparisons, in this work we test whether removing weak connections is indeed necessary. To this end, we systematically evaluated the effect of removing weak connections on a range of popular graph-theoretical metrics. Specifically, we investigated if (and at what extent) removal of weak connections introduces a statistically significant difference between two otherwise equal groups of healthy subjects when only applied to one of the groups. Using data from the Human Connectome Project, we found that removal of weak connections had no statistical effect even when removing the weakest ∼70-90% connections. Removing yet a larger extent of weak connections, thus reducing connectivity density even further, did produce a predictably significant effect. However, metric values became sensitive to the exact connectivity density, which has ramifications regarding the stability of the statistical analysis. This pattern persisted whether connections were removed by connection strength threshold or connectivity density, and for connectomes generated using parcellations at different resolutions. Finally, we showed that the same pattern also applies for data from a clinical-grade MRI scanner. In conclusion, our analysis revealed that removing weak connections is not necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted connectomes. Because removal of weak connections provides no practical utility to offset the undesirable requirement for arbitrary or heuristic-based choices, we recommend that this step is avoided in future studies.

[1]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jason D. Warren,et al.  Data-Driven Sequence of Changes to Anatomical Brain Connectivity in Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[3]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Correction for diffusion MRI fibre tracking biases: The consequences for structural connectomic metrics , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  Nikola T. Markov,et al.  Weight Consistency Specifies Regularities of Macaque Cortical Networks , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Jelle Veraart,et al.  Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Reconstruction Methods for Intra-Voxel Fiber Recovery From Diffusion MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks Revisited , 2016, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography , 2015, NeuroImage.

[15]  Peter B. Jones,et al.  Adolescent Tuning of Association Cortex in Human Structural Brain Networks , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  L. Cammoun,et al.  The Connectome Mapper: An Open-Source Processing Pipeline to Map Connectomes with MRI , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Weight Thresholding on Complex Networks , 2018, Physical Review E.

[20]  Martijn P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Non-parametric representation and prediction of single- and multi-shell diffusion-weighted MRI data using Gaussian processes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[23]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  Bastian Cheng,et al.  Network Localisation of White Matter Damage in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  MicroTrack: An Algorithm for Concurrent Projectome and Microstructure Estimation , 2010, MICCAI.

[27]  Susanne Schnell,et al.  Global fiber reconstruction becomes practical , 2011, NeuroImage.

[28]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Bibek Dhital,et al.  Gibbs‐ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel‐shifts , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Tract-Tracing Experiments Demonstrates a Dense, Complex Cortical Network in the Mouse , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging , 2016, NeuroImage.

[33]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Jacques-Donald Tournier,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  Yulia Kovas,et al.  Alpha Band Resting-State EEG Connectivity Is Associated With Non-verbal Intelligence , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Polimeni,et al.  Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  S. Horvath,et al.  A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis , 2005, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[40]  Henry Kennedy,et al.  A Predictive Network Model of Cerebral Cortical Connectivity Based on a Distance Rule , 2013, Neuron.

[41]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[42]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[43]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[45]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography , 2017, Nature Communications.

[46]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Multiplexed Echo Planar Imaging for Sub-Second Whole Brain FMRI and Fast Diffusion Imaging , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory , 2016, NeuroImage.

[48]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[49]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[50]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Overcoming the effects of false positives and threshold bias in graph theoretical analyses of neuroimaging data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[51]  Alberto Prats-Galino,et al.  Default Mode Network structural alterations in Kocher-Monro trajectory white matter transection: A 3 and 7 tesla simulation modeling approach , 2019, PloS one.

[52]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[53]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Global tractography of multi-shell diffusion-weighted imaging data using a multi-tissue model , 2015, NeuroImage.

[54]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[55]  Anbupalam Thalamuthu,et al.  The organisation of the elderly connectome , 2015, NeuroImage.

[56]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Global Tractography with Embedded Anatomical Priors for Quantitative Connectivity Analysis , 2014, Front. Neurol..

[57]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[58]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  AxTract: Toward microstructure informed tractography , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[59]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[60]  F. Pestilli,et al.  Evaluation and statistical inference for living connectomes , 2014, Nature Methods.

[61]  M. Mannerkoski,et al.  Topological Alterations of the Structural Brain Connectivity Network in Children with Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[62]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  The effect of network thresholding and weighting on structural brain networks in the UK Biobank , 2020, NeuroImage.

[63]  Alan Connelly,et al.  The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome , 2015, NeuroImage.

[64]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms , 2013, NeuroImage.

[65]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Multiband multislice GE‐EPI at 7 tesla, with 16‐fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole‐brain fMRI , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[66]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain , 2014, Nature.

[67]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics , 2012, NeuroImage.

[68]  G Cioni,et al.  Network over‐connectivity differentiates autism spectrum disorder from other developmental disorders in toddlers: A diffusion MRI study , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[69]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Effects of image reconstruction on fiber orientation mapping from multichannel diffusion MRI: Reducing the noise floor using SENSE , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[70]  Masaaki Hori,et al.  Connectome analysis with diffusion MRI in idiopathic Parkinson's disease: Evaluation using multi-shell, multi-tissue, constrained spherical deconvolution , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.