The Variables of Surface of Revolution and its effects on Human Visual Preference

[1]  Lauren E. Pedersen,et al.  Aging and Haptic-Visual Solid Shape Matching , 2017, Perception.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[3]  Flip Phillips,et al.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies” , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience. , 2011 .

[5]  I. C. McManus,et al.  Beyond the Golden Section and Normative Aesthetics: Why Do Individuals Differ so Much in Their Aesthetic Preferences for Rectangles? , 2010 .

[6]  J. Craig,et al.  Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration , 2007, Somatosensory & motor research.

[7]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[8]  Rebecca S. Jacobson,et al.  The Aesthetics of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[9]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  The Effects of volume on Perceived Heaviness by Dynamic Touch: With and Without Vision , 1997 .

[10]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Processing Depth, Elaboration of Encoding, Memory Stores, and Expended Processing Capacity. , 1979 .

[11]  V. Pishkin,et al.  Factors Involved in Visual Capture , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  J. Gibson.  Observations on active touch. , 1962, Psychological review.

[13]  C. Wallraven,et al.  Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  William S. Griscom,et al.  Accounting for taste: Individual differences in preference for harmony , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.