Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using two commercially available software packages. Materials and methods Ten dry human skulls were subjected to structured light scanning, CBCT scanning, and intra-oral scanning. Two commercially available software packages were used to perform fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT scan to create an accurate virtual head model: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™. The structured light scanner was used as a gold standard and was superimposed on the virtual head models, created by IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, using an Iterative Closest Point algorithm. Differences between the positions of the intra-oral scans obtained with the software packages were recorded and expressed in six degrees of freedom as well as the inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient. Results The tested software packages, IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, showed a high level of accuracy compared to the gold standard. The accuracy was calculated for all six degrees of freedom. It was noticeable that the accuracy in the cranial/caudal direction was the lowest for IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ in both the maxilla and mandible. The inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient showed a high level of agreement between the observers. Clinical relevance IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ are reliable software packages providing an accurate fusion of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT. Both software packages can be used as an accurate fusion tool of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT which provides an accurate basis for 3D virtual planning.

[1]  E. M. Lages,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of virtual and direct bonding of orthodontic accessories , 2019, Dental press journal of orthodontics.

[2]  C. Savoldelli,et al.  Dental occlusal-surface-supported titanium guide to assist cutting and drilling in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. , 2017, Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  S. Kapila,et al.  Moving towards precision orthodontics: An evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy. , 2017, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[4]  Rainer Schmelzeisen,et al.  Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  R. Weiss,et al.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review , 2019, Dentistry journal.

[6]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  Yi Sun,et al.  Accuracy of Upper Jaw Positioning With Intermediate Splint Fabrication After Virtual Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery , 2013, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[10]  Wen-Chung Chiang,et al.  Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  W. Mollemans,et al.  Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures. , 2010, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  Tong Xi,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue simulation in bimaxillary osteotomies. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[13]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Triple Scan Procedure to Obtain a Three-Dimensional Augmented Virtual Skull Model Appropriate for Orthognathic Surgery Planning , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  F Baan,et al.  Virtual setup in orthodontics: planning and evaluation , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  F. Mangano,et al.  Combining Intraoral Scans, Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Face Scans: The Virtual Patient , 2018, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  Yijin Ren,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  Christopher M. Collier,et al.  Characterisation of graphene electrodes for microsystems and microfluidic devices , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze,et al.  On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Planning algorithms , 2006 .

[20]  E. Yuzbasioglu,et al.  Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes , 2014, BMC oral health.

[21]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[22]  Thomas Maal,et al.  Automated detection of third molars and mandibular nerve by deep learning , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  A novel method for the 3-dimensional simulation of orthognathic surgery by using a multimodal image-fusion technique. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  A novel method for fusion of intra-oral scans and cone-beam computed tomography scans for orthognathic surgery planning. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[26]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[27]  U. Hirschfelder,et al.  Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography , 2015, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[28]  Jimmy Londono,et al.  Fabrication of a definitive obturator from a 3D cast with a chairside digital scanner for a patient with severe gag reflex: a clinical report. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  Thomas Maal,et al.  Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[30]  Evelina Lamma,et al.  From implant planning to surgical execution: an integrated approach for surgery in oral implantology , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[31]  A. Johal,et al.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[32]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[33]  H. Reijers,et al.  Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. , 2014, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  P. Major,et al.  Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review. , 2015, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[35]  K Stokbro,et al.  Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. , 2014, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[36]  C. Clercq,et al.  A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[37]  A. Ayoub,et al.  Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning. , 2018, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[38]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[39]  E Nkenke,et al.  Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.