Manufacture of energy storage and return prosthetic feet using selective laser sintering.

Proper selection of prosthetic foot-ankle components with appropriate design characteristics is critical for successful amputee rehabilitation. Elastic energy storage and return (ESAR) feet have been developed in an effort to improve amputee gait. However, the clinical efficacy of ESAR feet has been inconsistent, which could be due to inappropriate stiffness levels prescribed for a given amputee. Although a number of studies have analyzed the effect of ESAR feet on gait performance, the relationships between the stiffness characteristics and gait performance are not well understood. A challenge to understanding these relationships is the inability of current manufacturing techniques to easily generate feet with varying stiffness levels. The objective of this study was to develop a rapid prototyping framework using selective laser sintering (SLS) for the creation of prosthetic feet that can be used as a means to quantify the influence of varying foot stiffness on transtibial amputee walking. The framework successfully duplicated the stiffness characteristics of a commercial carbon fiber ESAR foot. The feet were mechanically tested and an experimental case study was performed to verify that the locomotor characteristics of the amputee's gait were the same when walking with the carbon fiber ESAR and SLS designs. Three-dimensional ground reaction force, kinematic, and kinetic quantities were measured while the subject walked at 1.2 m/s. The SLS foot was able to replicate the mechanical loading response and locomotor patterns of the ESAR foot within +/-2 standard deviations. This validated the current framework as a means to fabricate SLS-based ESAR prosthetic feet. Future work will be directed at creating feet with a range of stiffness levels to investigate appropriate prescription criteria.

[1]  Janice J Eng,et al.  A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  H. Hermens,et al.  Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[3]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  Design and analysis of orthogonally compliant features for local contact pressure relief in transtibial prostheses. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  J. Perry,et al.  Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  Advanced Trans-Tibial Socket Fabrication Using Selective Laser Sintering , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  Joseph M. Czerniecki.  Gait analysis in the amputee: Has it helped the amputee or contributed to the development of improved prosthetic components? , 1995 .

[7]  K. Svanberg.  The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[8]  G K Klute,et al.  Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: adapting to the patient. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  P. E. Martin,et al.  Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral transtibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Joseph M. Czerniecki,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices , 2002 .

[11]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[12]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Perception of Walking Difficulty by Below-Knee Amputees Using a Conventional Foot Versus the Flex-Foot , 1991 .

[13]  J S Arora,et al.  Accelerographic, temporal, and distance gait factors in below-knee amputees. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[14]  James Breakey,et al.  GAIT OF UNILATERAL BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEES , 2011 .

[15]  Joseph J. Beaman.  Solid freeform fabrication : a new direction in manufacturing : with research and applications in thermal laser processing , 1997 .

[16]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  T. Royer,et al.  Hip and knee frontal plane moments in persons with unilateral, trans-tibial amputation. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[19]  Richard H. Crawford,et al.  Case Report: Variably Compliant Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Fabricated Using Solid Freeform Fabrication , 2008 .

[20]  Gordon Bennett,et al.  Finite Element Analysis as a Tool for Parametric Prosthetic Foot Design and Evaluation. Technique Development in the Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH) Foot , 2003, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Richard H. Crawford,et al.  Manufacture of Passive Dynamic Ankle–Foot Orthoses Using Selective Laser Sintering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Gait in male trans-tibial amputees: A comparative study with healthy subjects in relation to walking speed , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  E. Isakov,et al.  The influence of prosthetic foot alignment on trans-tibial amputee gait , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[25]  R.R. Neptune,et al.  An Experimental and Theoretical Framework for Manufacturing Prosthetic Sockets for Transtibial Amputees , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  William R. Ledoux,et al.  Gait Simulation via a 6-DOF Parallel Robot With Iterative Learning Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab , 2001 .

[28]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.