Interpersonal Relationships Moderate the Effect of Faces on Person Judgments

Previous research suggests that people form impressions of others based on their facial appearance in a very fast and automatic manner, and this especially holds for trustworthiness. However, as yet, this process has been investigated mostly in a social vacuum without taking interpersonal factors into account. In the current research, we demonstrate that both the relationship context that is salient at the moment of an interaction and the performed behavior, are important moderators of the impact of facial cues on impression formation. It is shown that, when the behavior of a person we encounter is ambiguous in terms of trustworthiness, the relationship most salient at that moment is of crucial impact on whether and how we incorporate facial cues communicating (un)trustworthiness in our final evaluations. Ironically, this can result in less positive evaluations of interaction partners with a trustworthy face compared to interaction partners with an untrustworthy face. Implications for research on facial characteristics, trust, and relationship theories are discussed.

[1]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Beliefs About Cues to Deception: Mindless Stereotypes or Untapped Wisdom? , 1999 .

[2]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Burnstein,et al.  Encoding under trust and distrust: the spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Familiar eyes are smiling: On the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect , 2007 .

[6]  C. Macrae,et al.  Putting A Face on Person Perception , 2006 .

[7]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[8]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Appearance DOES Matter , 2005, Science.

[9]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[10]  S. Brownlow,et al.  Seeing is believing: Facial appearance, credibility, and attitude change , 1992 .

[11]  H. Aarts,et al.  The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood: , 2007 .

[13]  H. Aarts,et al.  Automatic normative behavior in environments: The moderating role of conformity in activating situational norms , 2003 .

[14]  J. Simpson Psychological Foundations of Trust , 2007 .

[15]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent , 2000 .

[16]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Deliberative and Automatic Bases of Suspicion: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error , 2007 .

[17]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  A. Fiske The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[19]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation , 2006 .

[20]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  The Price of Friendship: When, Why, and How Relational Norms Guide Social Exchange Behavior , 2005 .