The Evolving Medical Record

Form dictates content, and the manner of recordkeeping imposed on us probably influences how we think about patients. At The New York Hospital, physicians began to maintain permanent patient case records in the early 1800s. Originally proposed and valued as teaching cases for medical students, these freeform patient records varied in quality and often reflected not just the medical care of the time but also the personalities of the physicians composing them. At the end of the 19th century, the change from retrospective to real-time recording of cases and the imposition of a fixed chart structure through the use of forms dramatically reduced the narrative dimension of the hospital course. Gradually, physicians found ways to circumvent these restrictions. Changes in record format, designed to manage increasing volumes of data, and physicians' responses to those changes parallel some of the contemporary threats to documentation posed by the electronic health record.

[1]  Some Hospitalization Problems-Hospital Standardization. , 1922, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[2]  TOWER OF BABEL 1963. , 1963, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  L. Weed.  Medical records that guide and teach. , 1968, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The problems of the "problem-oriented medical record". , 1973, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  Transformation and tradition in the sciences. Essays in honor of I.Bernard Cohen , 1986, Medical History.

[6]  John Harley Warner.  The Therapeutic Perspective: Medical Practice, Knowledge, and Identity in America, 1820-1885 , 1986 .

[7]  T. Meriden.  A Piece of My Mind , 1988, Diabetes Care.

[8]  J F Burnum,et al.  The misinformation era: the fall of the medical record. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  B L Craig.  Hospital records and record-keeping c.1850-c.1950. Part I. , 1989, Archivaria.

[10]  Craig Bl.  Hospital records and record-keeping c.1850-c.1950. Part II. , 1990 .

[11]  S. Reiser.  The clinical record in medicine. Part 2: Reforming content and purpose. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  Joel D. Howell,et al.  Technology in the Hospital: Transforming Patient Care in the Early Twentieth Century , 1995, Nursing History Review.

[13]  S. Goodrich,et al.  A Piece of My Mind , 2014 .

[14]  G. Bowker,et al.  The multiple bodies of the medical record : Toward a sociology of an artifact , 1996 .

[15]  Colin Jones,et al.  Mending bodies, saving souls: a history of hospitals , 2001, Medical History.

[16]  Robert E. Hirschtick.  Copy-and-Paste , 2006 .

[17]  P J D'Arbon,et al.  Tower of Babel , 2014 .

[18]  Osler's service: a view of the charts. , 2007, Journal of medical biography.

[19]  Kenric W. Hammond,et al.  Copying and pasting of examinations within the electronic medical record , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  E. Siegler,et al.  Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records. , 2009, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  E. Cohen,et al.  Off the Record — Avoiding the Pitfalls of Going Electronic , 2009 .

[22]  Colin P. West,et al.  Time spent on clinical documentation: a survey of internal medicine residents and program directors. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  Daniel M. Stein,et al.  Research paper: Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..